Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2026-7419

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was identified in UTT HiPER 1250GW up to 3.2.7-210907-180535. This issue affects the function strcpy of the file route/goform/formTaskEdit_ap. The manipulation of the argument Profile leads to buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in UTT HiPER 1250GW router firmware (up to 3.2.7-210907-180535) in the formTaskEdit_ap web interface function. The strcpy function copies the 'Profile' parameter without length validation, allowing remote attackers to overflow a buffer via crafted HTTP requests.

MitigationRestrict network access to the device's web management interface, disable remote administration if enabled, and apply vendor firmware updates when available. Consider network segmentation for affected devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Check the device label on the router itself or access the web management interface (commonly at 192.168.1.1) and look for the model name displayed on the login page or status page
    Affected if Device is not a UTT HiPER 1250GW router - the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Check the firmware version
    Access the router web interface and navigate to the Status, System Information, or Firmware Upgrade page to view the installed firmware version. The version format appears as X.X.X-YYMMDD-HHMMSS
    Affected if Firmware version is 3.2.7-210907-180535 or earlier (any version up to and including this release)
  3. Verify web interface is remotely accessible
    From a network location outside your local network (such as using a mobile data connection or a VPN), attempt to access the router by entering its public IP address in a web browser. If a login page loads, the interface is externally accessible
    Affected if The web management interface responds to HTTP requests from external networks
  4. Confirm remote administration setting
    Log into the router web interface and locate the Remote Management, Remote Access, or Administration settings (typically under Advanced or System settings). Check if remote administration is enabled and note which interfaces (HTTP/HTTPS) and IP ranges are permitted
    Affected if Remote administration is enabled and allows access from external/untrusted IP addresses

The device is affected only if it is a UTT HiPER 1250GW router running firmware version 3.2.7-210907-180535 or earlier AND the web management interface is accessible from external networks with remote administration enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict network access to the device's web management interface, disable remote administration if enabled, and apply vendor firmware updates when available. Consider network segmentation for affected devices.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,024.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7419 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7419 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data