SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-7486

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in Netcad Software Inc. E-İmar allows SQL Injection. This issue affects E-İmar: from 2.10.1.0 before 3.0.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A SQL injection vulnerability in Netcad E-İmar versions 2.10.1.0 through before 3.0.2 allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements in user input. This critical flaw (CVSS 9.8) could enable unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise.

MitigationUpgrade E-İmar to version 3.0.2 or later to receive the patch; additionally, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements and validate/sanitize all user inputs to prevent SQL injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Netcad E-İmar version
    Locate the installed Netcad E-İmar software and retrieve its version number. This is typically found in the application properties, about dialog, or installation directory metadata.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 2.10.1.0 through any version before 3.0.2
  2. Compare version to affected range
    Verify whether the identified version is greater than or equal to 2.10.1.0 AND less than 3.0.2. Any version in this range is vulnerable.
    Affected if Version is >= 2.10.1.0 AND < 3.0.2
  3. Confirm database-facing functionality
    Determine if the Netcad E-İmar installation has active database connectivity and processes user-provided data through SQL queries. This may involve reviewing application modules that handle user input in database operations.
    Affected if The application processes unsanitized user input in database queries, which is the core vulnerability condition
  4. Check for vulnerable query handling
    Inspect the application configuration or code for direct SQL query construction using user input without parameterized queries or input validation mechanisms.
    Affected if User input is directly concatenated into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterization

A system is affected if Netcad E-İmar version is between 2.10.1.0 and 3.0.2 (exclusive) AND the application processes user input in database operations without proper sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade E-İmar to version 3.0.2 or later to receive the patch; additionally, implement parameterized queries or prepared statements and validate/sanitize all user inputs to prevent SQL injection.

Recommended fix High confidence

Netcad E-İmar version 3.0.2 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of Netcad E-İmar software
  2. 2. Create a complete backup of all E-İmar data, databases, and configuration files
  3. 3. Download Netcad E-İmar version 3.0.2 or later from the official Netcad vendor source
  4. 4. Install the upgrade following the vendor's standard installation procedures
  5. 5. Verify the installation completed successfully
  6. 6. Test the E-İmar application to confirm normal functionality after upgrade
  7. 7. Validate that the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer present
Caveat Review vendor release notes for any configuration changes or data migration requirements between 2.x and 3.x versions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,340
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,144.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7486 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7486 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data