Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2026-7513

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in UTT HiPER 1200GW up to 2.5.3-170306. The impacted element is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formRemoteControl. The manipulation leads to buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the strcpy function within the /goform/formRemoteControl web interface component of UTT HiPER 1200GW routers up to version 2.5.3-170306. The use of the unsafe strcpy function allows overflow of a fixed-size buffer via crafted input, potentially enabling remote code execution. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely and a public exploit exists.

MitigationApply vendor firmware update when available; if no patch exists, disable remote management interface and implement network segmentation to limit exposure. Monitor for indicators of compromise given public exploit availability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Access the router web interface or check device label to confirm model is UTT HiPER 1200GW. Alternatively, run 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or check SNMP sysDescr if you have CLI access.
    Affected if Device is not a UTT HiPER 1200GW router, then it is not affected by this specific CVE.
  2. Check firmware version
    Log into the router web interface and look for the firmware version in the system status or administration page. The vulnerable version is any version up to and including 2.5.3-170306.
    Affected if Firmware version is 2.5.3-170306 or earlier.
  3. Verify remote management is enabled
    In the router web interface, navigate to the remote management or web service settings. Look for options like 'Enable Remote Management', 'Allow Remote Web Access', or similar settings that control access to the /goform/* endpoints from WAN.
    Affected if Remote management interface is enabled and accessible from WAN or untrusted networks.
  4. Test for vulnerable endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access http://<routerWANIP>/goform/formRemoteControl from a network outside the local LAN. A 404 or authentication prompt indicates the endpoint exists; connection timeout or refusal means it may be disabled.
    Affected if The /goform/formRemoteControl endpoint is reachable from an untrusted network without additional authentication barriers.

The device is affected if it is a UTT HiPER 1200GW router running firmware version 2.5.3-170306 or earlier AND the web interface with the vulnerable formRemoteControl component is accessible from untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware update when available; if no patch exists, disable remote management interface and implement network segmentation to limit exposure. Monitor for indicators of compromise given public exploit availability.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7513 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data