WolfsslApplication

CVE-2026-7531

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.9.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Use-after-free in PQC hybrid key-share handling. This is an incomplete-fix follow-up to CVE-2026-5460 (released in 5.9.1): a malicious TLS 1.3 server sending a truncated PQC hybrid KeyShare can still trigger the error cleanup path to operate on freed memory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Use-after-free vulnerability in PQC hybrid key-share handling within TLS 1.3. A malicious server sending a truncated Post-Quantum Cryptography hybrid KeyShare can trigger the error cleanup path to operate on already-freed memory, allowing potential memory corruption or code execution.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version containing the complete fix for this incomplete CVE-2026-5460 patch; if unavailable, consider temporarily disabling PQC hybrid cipher suites in affected TLS implementations until a full patch is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WolfsslApplication
Affected:>= 5.8.0, < 5.9.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WolfSSL installation and version
    Run `wolfssl version` or check your package manager for the installed wolfssl/wolfss package version
    Affected if The installed version is 5.8.0, 5.9.0, or 5.9.1 (any version >= 5.8.0 and < 5.9.2)
  2. Confirm TLS 1.3 support is enabled
    Check your WolfSSL compile-time and runtime configuration for TLS 1.3 support using `wolfssl -?` or reviewing your build configuration files
    Affected if TLS 1.3 is compiled in or enabled at runtime
  3. Verify PQC hybrid cipher suites are in use
    Inspect your TLS server/client configuration to determine if Post-Quantum Cryptography hybrid key exchange methods (such as Kyber) are enabled in your cipher suite list
    Affected if PQC hybrid cipher suites (e.g., TLS 1.3 with hybrid key exchange) are configured or negotiated between clients and servers
  4. Check for exposure to malicious servers
    Determine if your WolfSSL instance acts as a TLS client connecting to external servers, as the vulnerability is triggered by a malicious server sending a truncated hybrid KeyShare
    Affected if The affected WolfSSL installation is used as a TLS 1.3 client connecting to untrusted or external TLS servers

You are affected if you have WolfSSL versions 5.8.0 through 5.9.1 with TLS 1.3 and PQC hybrid cipher suites enabled, especially when acting as a TLS client connecting to external servers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.9.2 or later
Fixed in 5.9.2
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Update to the latest version containing the complete fix for this incomplete CVE-2026-5460 patch; if unavailable, consider temporarily disabling PQC hybrid cipher suites in affected TLS implementations until a full patch is released.

Recommended fix High confidence

WolfSSL 5.9.2 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current WolfSSL version in use by checking your project dependencies or build system.
  2. 2. Upgrade WolfSSL to version 5.9.2 or later to address the use-after-free vulnerability in PQC hybrid key-share handling.
  3. 3. Rebuild and redeploy any applications or services that link against the WolfSSL library.
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new WolfSSL version at runtime.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Wolfssl Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7531 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7531 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data