CVE-2026-7590
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in eyal-gor p_69_branch_monkey_mcp up to 69bc71874ce40050ef45fde5a435855f18af3373. The affected element is an unknown function of the file branch_monkey_mcp/bridge_and_local_actions/routes/advanced.py of the component Preview Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument dev_script leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the Preview Endpoint of branch_monkey_mcp (advanced.py) where the dev_script argument is passed unsafely to OS command execution. Attackers can inject arbitrary shell commands via this parameter, leading to complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the branch_monkey_mcp package installationUse pip show branch_monkey_mcp or python -c "import branch_monkey_mcp; print(branch_monkey_mcp.__file__)" to find where the package is installedAffected if The package is not installed, then the environment is not affected by this CVE
-
Identify the installed version of branch_monkey_mcpRun pip show branch_monkey_mcp and note the Version field, or import the package and check its __version__ attribute if availableAffected if The installed version falls within any affected version range (compare to the fixed version once available)
-
Locate the vulnerable advanced.py fileFind advanced.py within the branch_monkey_mcp package directory - this file contains the Preview Endpoint with the command injection flawAffected if advanced.py is not found in the package, the vulnerability may not be present
-
Inspect the Preview Endpoint implementation in advanced.pyOpen advanced.py and search for the Preview Endpoint function; locate where the dev_script parameter is passed to OS command execution functions (such as os.system, subprocess with shell=True, or similar)Affected if The dev_script argument is passed directly to any OS command execution function without sanitization, validation, or use of shell=False, then the environment is vulnerable
-
Determine if the Preview Endpoint is exposedCheck the application configuration or routing to see if the Preview Endpoint is registered and accessible (check for route definitions like /preview, /preview_endpoint, or similar in the application's main entry point or API definitions)Affected if The Preview Endpoint is accessible and the code in step 4 shows unsafe handling of dev_script, then the environment is vulnerable to command injection
The environment is affected if branch_monkey_mcp is installed with a version that includes the vulnerable Preview Endpoint in advanced.py, where dev_script is passed unsafely to OS command execution without sanitization or shell=False protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSanitize and validate the dev_script input before passing to any OS command execution functions. Prefer using subprocess with shell=False and passing arguments as a list, or implement strict allow-listing of permitted values.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7590 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7590 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data