CVE-2026-7661
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Bootstrap Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `box` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Bootstrap Shortcode WordPress plugin fails to sanitize and escape user-supplied attributes in the 'box' shortcode, allowing authenticated attackers with Contributor-level or higher permissions to inject malicious JavaScript that persists in page content and executes when viewed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Bootstrap Shortcode plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm 'Bootstrap Shortcode' or similar plugin is active. Note the installed version from the plugin description.Affected if The plugin is installed and active with no patch applied to sanitize shortcode attributes.
-
Identify all posts/pages using the 'box' shortcodeSearch your WordPress database: SELECT ID, post_title, post_content FROM wp_posts WHERE post_content LIKE '%[box%' AND post_status='publish'; (adjust prefix if needed).Affected if Any published content contains the 'box' shortcode with user-supplied attributes.
-
Inspect shortcode attributes for lack of escapingExamine the raw post_content for [box] shortcode usage. Look for attributes that accept user input (e.g., title, content, class, href) that may contain unsanitized values.Affected if The shortcode attributes contain raw HTML, JavaScript, or unescaped special characters like < > " ' without proper encoding.
-
Check for existing XSS payloads in shortcode contentManually review posts containing [box] shortcodes. Search for patterns like javascript:, onload=, onerror=, <script>, or encoded payloads in attribute values.Affected if Malicious JavaScript or HTML injection payloads are present in any box shortcode attributes.
-
Verify contributor-level user accounts existNavigate to WordPress admin > Users and review user roles. Contributor role can create published content via shortcodes if proper capability checks are missing.Affected if Any user with Contributor or higher role exists who could author content with the vulnerable shortcode.
A user is affected if the Bootstrap Shortcode plugin is installed, the 'box' shortcode is used in published content, and that content contains unsanitized user-supplied attributes that could execute malicious JavaScript when viewed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the plugin to a patched version once available, and implement proper input sanitization (sanitize_text_field) and output escaping (esc_html, esc_attr) on all shortcode attributes before rendering.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7661 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7661 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data