Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2026-7675

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been found in Shenzhen Libituo Technology LBT-T300-HW1 up to 1.2.8. Impacted is the function start_lan of the file /apply.cgi. The manipulation of the argument Channel/ApCliSsid leads to buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Shenzhen Libituo LBT-T300-HW1 routers (firmware up to v1.2.8) in the /apply.cgi endpoint. The start_lan function fails to properly validate the Channel/ApCliSsid parameter, allowing remote attackers to overflow a buffer via crafted input. The exploit is publicly available and trivially exploitable over the network.

MitigationSince the vendor is unresponsive, immediately restrict administrative interface exposure to trusted networks only using firewall rules or VLAN segmentation. Monitor for signs of exploitation and consider device replacement if no firmware update becomes available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Access the router admin interface or check the device label/sticker to confirm the model is Shenzhen Libituo LBT-T300-HW1
    Affected if Device is confirmed to be a Libituo LBT-T300-HW1 router
  2. Check the firmware version
    Log into the router admin panel and locate the firmware version information, typically found under Status, System Info, or Firmware Upgrade sections
    Affected if Firmware version is v1.2.8 or any version below 1.2.8
  3. Verify network exposure of admin interface
    Test connectivity to the router's HTTP/HTTPS ports (typically 80/443) from untrusted networks. Use an external port scanner or attempt to access /apply.cgi from outside your trusted network
    Affected if The /apply.cgi endpoint is reachable from untrusted/networked interfaces without firewall restriction
  4. Check for indicators of compromise
    Review router logs for unusual POST requests to /apply.cgi, especially those with abnormally long strings in the Channel or ApCliSsid parameters. Monitor for unexpected configuration changes or new admin accounts
    Affected if Log entries show suspicious long parameter values in /apply.cgi requests or unexpected configuration modifications

You are affected if the device is a Libituo LBT-T300-HW1 router running firmware v1.2.8 or lower AND the /apply.cgi administrative endpoint is exposed to untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since the vendor is unresponsive, immediately restrict administrative interface exposure to trusted networks only using firewall rules or VLAN segmentation. Monitor for signs of exploitation and consider device replacement if no firmware update becomes available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7675 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7675 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data