CVE-2026-7745
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in CodeAstro Online Classroom 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /OnlineClassroom/facultydetails. This manipulation of the argument deleteid causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCodeAstro Online Classroom 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection via the deleteid parameter in the /OnlineClassroom/facultydetails endpoint. Attackers can inject malicious SQL queries through this parameter to manipulate database operations, potentially exfiltrating, modifying, or deleting data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed CodeAstro Online Classroom versionLocate the application installation directory or check the software inventory/billing records for CodeAstro Online Classroom version 1.0Affected if The installed version is CodeAstro Online Classroom 1.0
-
Confirm the facultydetails endpoint existsCheck if the web application exposes the /OnlineClassroom/facultydetails path by accessing it via browser or sending an HTTP requestAffected if The endpoint is accessible and responds to requests
-
Verify the deleteid parameter is acceptedSubmit a request to the facultydetails endpoint with a deleteid parameter (even a benign value) and observe if the application processes itAffected if The application accepts and processes the deleteid parameter without error or sanitization feedback
-
Inspect backend code for dynamic SQL constructionExamine the server-side code handling the facultydetails endpoint, looking for SQL queries that incorporate the deleteid parameter directly without using parameterized queries or prepared statementsAffected if The code constructs SQL queries dynamically using the deleteid parameter without sanitization
A user is affected if they run CodeAstro Online Classroom 1.0 with the /OnlineClassroom/facultydetails endpoint accessible and the deleteid parameter processed without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries to properly sanitize the deleteid parameter before using it in SQL queries, and apply input validation to reject unexpected characters.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7745 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7745 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data