LangflowApplication

CVE-2026-7803

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.10.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow arbitrary code execution due to improper validation of flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 fails to properly validate flow node configuration, specifically when component type fields are missing or empty. This input validation failure allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code through specially crafted flow nodes.

MitigationUpgrade to the patched version of IBM Langflow. If immediate patching is not possible, implement input validation to reject flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields, and apply allowlist-based filtering for permitted component types.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LangflowApplication
Affected:>= 1.0.0, <= 1.10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Langflow version
    Run 'pip show langflow' or check the package version in your Python environment, or look for version info in the running application
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 inclusive
  2. Inspect flow node validation logic
    Review the code that handles flow node configuration parsing, specifically around component type field validation in your Langflow installation
    Affected if Flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields are accepted without rejection
  3. Test flow node creation endpoint
    Submit a flow node with an empty or missing component type field to the flow creation/update API and observe if it is accepted
    Affected if The API accepts and processes flow nodes without validating that component type fields are present and non-empty
  4. Check for allowlist-based filtering
    Examine whether the application implements allowlist filtering for permitted component types in the flow node processing code
    Affected if No allowlist filtering is implemented for component types

You are affected if your Langflow version is between 1.0.0 and 1.10.0 and your environment accepts flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.10.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to the patched version of IBM Langflow. If immediate patching is not possible, implement input validation to reject flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields, and apply allowlist-based filtering for permitted component types.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Langflow 1.10.1 or later

  1. 1. Verify current Langflow installation version using package manager or application metadata
  2. 2. Stop the Langflow service before performing upgrade
  3. 3. Upgrade Langflow to version 1.10.1 or later by running: pip install --upgrade langflow or using the appropriate package manager for your deployment
  4. 4. Verify the new version is installed: pip show langflow
  5. 5. Restart the Langflow service
  6. 6. Test that flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields are properly rejected and do not allow arbitrary code execution

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Langflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7803 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7803 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data