Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2026-7823

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security flaw has been discovered in Totolink A8000RU 7.1cu.643_b20200521. Affected is the function setAppFilterCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. The manipulation of the argument enable results in os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OS command injection vulnerability in Totolink A8000RU router firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521. The web interface CGI script /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi does not properly sanitize input to the 'enable' parameter in the setAppFilterCfg function, allowing arbitrary command execution with root privileges.

MitigationApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the router's web interface, disable remote administration if enabled, and monitor for indicators of compromise.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and firmware version
    Access the router's web administration interface and navigate to System Status or Firmware version page. Alternatively, check the label on the device or use the command 'cat /proc/version' or 'nvram get firmver' if you have telnet/ssh access.
    Affected if The device is a Totolink A8000RU running firmware version 7.1cu.643_b20200521.
  2. Confirm vulnerable CGI script presence
    Access the router's web interface and attempt to reach /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi via HTTP GET request, or check the filesystem via telnet/ssh if available using 'ls -la /www/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi'.
    Affected if The file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi exists on the device.
  3. Determine if web interface is network accessible
    Check router administration settings to see if Remote Management/Remote Administration is enabled. From an external host, attempt to reach the router's IP on ports 80/443 using 'curl http://<router-ip>/' or 'nmap -p 80,443 <router-ip>'.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible from untrusted networks, or Remote Administration is enabled allowing external access.
  4. Inspect for indicators of compromise
    Review router logs for suspicious requests to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi, especially with unusual 'enable' parameter values. Check for unexpected new admin accounts, changed DNS settings, or unknown processes using 'ps' command via telnet/ssh.
    Affected if Log entries show requests to the CGI with command-like strings in the 'enable' parameter, or unauthorized configuration changes are detected.

A defender is affected if they have a Totolink A8000RU router running firmware 7.1cu.643_b20200521 with the web interface accessible to untrusted networks, and the vulnerable CGI script is present.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the router's web interface, disable remote administration if enabled, and monitor for indicators of compromise.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,220
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,552.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7823 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7823 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data