Link Following (Symlink)Weakness · CWE-59

CVE-2026-7832

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A security flaw has been discovered in IObit Advanced SystemCare 19. This affects an unknown part of the file ASC.exe of the component Service. The manipulation results in symlink following. Attacking locally is a requirement. This attack is characterized by high complexity. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A symlink following vulnerability in the Service component of IObit Advanced SystemCare 19 (ASC.exe) allows a local authenticated attacker to manipulate symbolic links to escalate privileges or perform unauthorized file operations. The vulnerability has high attack complexity and difficult exploitability but a public exploit exists.

MitigationUpgrade to the latest version of IObit Advanced SystemCare if available, or evaluate removing the software if unnecessary. Implement least-privilege user permissions and monitor for unauthorized symlink creation in service directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IObit Advanced SystemCare installation
    Check for the presence of IObit Advanced SystemCare in Program Files or Program Files (x86). Look for folder 'IObit' or file 'ASC.exe'. Use PowerShell: Get-ChildItem 'C:\Program Files*\IObit' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
    Affected if IObit Advanced SystemCare 19 is installed on the system
  2. Confirm installed version number
    Locate ASC.exe, right-click and select Properties, or use command: (Get-Item 'C:\Program Files*\IObit\Advanced SystemCare\ASC.exe').VersionInfo.FileVersion. Also check in Programs and Features
    Affected if The version shows 19.x (any subversion of version 19)
  3. Verify ASC.exe service is running
    Open Services (services.msc) and look for 'Advanced SystemCare Service' or check via command: Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*Advanced SystemCare*'}. Also check for running ASC.exe process in Task Manager
    Affected if The Advanced SystemCare service or ASC.exe process is running or installed to run
  4. Inspect service executable path
    Run 'sc qc' on the Advanced SystemCare service (if found) or check the service binary path in Registry: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Advanced SystemCare*
    Affected if The service points to ASC.exe in the IObit installation directory
  5. Check for symlink vulnerability indicators
    Monitor or inspect the service working directory and temp folders for unauthorized symbolic links. Look in: %ProgramData%\IObit, %Temp%, and the service installation folder. Use: Get-ChildItem -Path 'C:\Program Files*\IObit' -Recurse -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Where-Object {$_.LinkType -eq 'SymbolicLink'}
    Affected if Any unexpected symbolic links exist in IObit service-related directories that point to sensitive locations

A system is affected if IObit Advanced SystemCare version 19.x is installed and the ASC.exe service/process is present and running, as the symlink following vulnerability exists in the Service component of this version.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to the latest version of IObit Advanced SystemCare if available, or evaluate removing the software if unnecessary. Implement least-privilege user permissions and monitor for unauthorized symlink creation in service directories.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7832 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data