CVE-2026-7888
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcrete CMS below 9.5.2 is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection via unserialize() calls in the Workflow, Form block, and File/Set components that lack the allowed_classes restriction. An unauthenticated attacker may trigger arbitrary PHP object instantiation if a malicious serialized payload has been placed in the database. Thanks XananasX7 and Sanjorn Keeratirungsan (dizconnect) for both independently reporting. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v.4.0 score of 8.4 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceConcrete CMS below 9.5.2 contains PHP Object Injection vulnerabilities in Workflow, Form block, and File/Set components. The vulnerabilities stem from unserialize() calls that lack the allowed_classes restriction, allowing unserialize() to instantiate any PHP class. An attacker with database write access (PR:H) can place malicious serialized payloads in the database, which are then deserialized by the application, potentially leading to RCE via magic methods like __destruct or __wakeup.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Concrete CMS versionAccess the Concrete CMS admin dashboard and navigate to Dashboard > System Information > Basics, or inspect the version.php file in the /config directory of your installation.Affected if The installed version is below 9.5.2 (for example, 9.5.1, 9.5.0, 9.4.x, 9.3.x, or earlier major versions).
-
Identify use of vulnerable componentsCheck if any of the following are in use or enabled in your installation: Workflow functionality (check /application/src/Concrete/Workflow or similar paths), Form block (check for blocks of type 'form' in the database or via the pages interface), and File/Set management features.Affected if Any of these components (Workflow, Form block, or File/Set) are actively used or installed on your site.
-
Locate unserialize() calls in source codeSearch the application source code for unserialize() function calls, focusing on files within the Workflow, Form block, and File/Set directories. Use a command such as 'grep -rn "unserialize(" /path/to/concrete/ --include="*.php"' to identify these calls.Affected if You find unserialize() calls in any of the affected component files (Workflow, Form block, File/Set) that do not include the allowed_classes parameter.
-
Verify allowed_classes parameter in unserialize callsExamine each unserialize() call identified in the affected components and check whether it includes the second parameter (allowed_classes). For example, look for patterns like unserialize($data, ['allowed_classes' => [...] ]) or unserialize($data, false).Affected if Any unserialize() call in the affected components either omits the second parameter entirely or does not properly restrict allowed_classes.
-
Inspect database for suspicious serialized contentQuery the database for unusually long or encoded strings in tables related to Workflow, Form block (such as btForm tables), and File/Set (such as FileSetSavedSearches). Look for serialized PHP objects that may contain malicious payloads.Affected if You find unexpected serialized objects in database tables associated with these components, particularly objects that do not match expected class structures.
You are affected if your Concrete CMS installation is version 9.5.1 or below AND you use any of the Workflow, Form block, or File/Set components, with unserialize() calls lacking the allowed_classes restriction found in those components.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Concrete CMS to version 9.5.2 or later. Alternatively, apply code fixes to add allowed_classes parameter to all unserialize() calls in the affected components, restricting deserialization to only expected classes.
Concrete CMS 9.5.2
- Upgrade Concrete CMS to version 9.5.2 or later to resolve the PHP Object Injection vulnerability
- After upgrading, verify that the unserialize() calls in Workflow, Form block, and File/Set components now properly use the allowed_classes restriction
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- Ensure all serialized data in the database is from trusted sources, as the vulnerability requires malicious payload to already exist in the database
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-7888 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-7888 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data