Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2026-8046

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The affected products insufficiently verify authorization when deleting user accounts. An authenticated, low-privileged remote user can exploit this vulnerability to delete other users, including those with higher privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The affected products have an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability where the user account deletion endpoint does not properly verify the caller's authorization level. An authenticated low-privileged user can send requests to delete other user accounts, including administrators, by manipulating user identifiers in the deletion request.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks on the user deletion endpoint to ensure the requesting user has sufficient privileges to delete the target account, and validate that users can only delete their own accounts unless explicitly authorized.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify user deletion API endpoint
    Review application API documentation, network traffic logs, or perform endpoint enumeration (e.g., GET /api/users, POST /api/users/{id}/delete) to locate any user account deletion functionality
    Affected if The application exposes an API endpoint that allows user account deletion requests
  2. Verify authentication requirement
    Send a request to the deletion endpoint without valid authentication credentials and observe the response
    Affected if The endpoint accepts unauthenticated requests (this indicates a critical exposure regardless of the IDOR issue)
  3. Inspect authorization logic
    Examine server-side code, middleware, or API gateway configuration for authorization checks that verify the requesting user's permissions before executing account deletion
    Affected if No server-side authorization check exists, or the check only validates authentication without verifying the user has permission to delete the specific target account
  4. Check role-based access control enforcement
    Review how user roles are defined and whether the deletion endpoint enforces privilege-level validation (e.g., preventing low-privileged users from deleting admin accounts)
    Affected if The application does not verify that the requesting user's privilege level matches or exceeds the target user's privilege level before deletion
  5. Test IDOR vulnerability
    As a low-privileged authenticated user, attempt to delete a different user account (such as an administrator) by manipulating the user identifier parameter in the deletion request
    Affected if The deletion request succeeds for a user who should not have permission to delete the target account

A user is affected if the application's user deletion endpoint lacks proper server-side authorization checks, allowing any authenticated user to delete arbitrary accounts including administrators by manipulating user identifiers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks on the user deletion endpoint to ensure the requesting user has sufficient privileges to delete the target account, and validate that users can only delete their own accounts unless explicitly authorized.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8046 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8046 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data