MultipartyApplication · Pillarjs

CVE-2026-8161

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
[email protected] and lower versions are vulnerable to denial of service via uncaught exception. By sending a multipart/form-data request with a field name that collides with an inherited Object.prototype property such as __proto__, constructor, or toString, the parser invokes .push() on the inherited prototype value rather than an array, throwing a TypeError that propagates as an uncaught exception and crashes the process. Impact: any service accepting multipart uploads via multiparty is affected. Workarounds: none. Upgrade to [email protected] or higher.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The multiparty library versions 4.2.3 and below fail to validate field names in multipart/form-data requests against inherited Object.prototype properties. When a field name like __proto__, constructor, or toString is sent, the parser attempts to call .push() on the inherited prototype value instead of an array, causing a TypeError that crashes the Node.js process.

MitigationUpgrade multiparty to version 4.3.0 or higher, which includes proper prototype property filtering in the multipart field parser.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MultipartyApplication
Affected:< 4.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check multiparty version in use
    Run 'npm list multiparty' in your project directory or inspect node_modules/multiparty/package.json to find the installed version
    Affected if The installed version is 4.2.3 or lower (any version below 4.3.0)
  2. Identify if your application uses multiparty for file uploads
    Search your codebase for 'require("multiparty")' or 'import multiparty' and verify the Form class is instantiated to handle multipart/form-data requests
    Affected if Your application uses multiparty Form to parse incoming multipart requests
  3. Check if user-supplied field names reach the multipart parser without sanitization
    Inspect your code where form.parse() is called - look for whether field name parameters from the request are passed directly to the parser without filtering prototype property names like __proto__, constructor, or toString
    Affected if User input field names are passed directly to form.parse() without filtering Object.prototype properties
  4. Look for crash logs or TypeError occurrences
    Search your application logs for 'TypeError' messages mentioning '.push is not a function' or similar errors occurring during multipart request processing
    Affected if Your application has crashed with a TypeError when processing multipart form data containing field names like __proto__

You are affected if multiparty version is below 4.3.0 AND your application parses multipart form data from untrusted sources without filtering field names for prototype properties.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.3.0 or later
Fixed in 4.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade multiparty to version 4.3.0 or higher, which includes proper prototype property filtering in the multipart field parser.

Recommended fix High confidence

[email protected]

  1. Run `npm install [email protected]` to install the fixed version, or update your package.json dependency to "multiparty": ">=4.3.0" and run `npm install`

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Multiparty Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8161 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8161 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data