CVE-2026-8305
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in OpenClaw up to 2026.1.24. The impacted element is the function handleBlueBubblesWebhookRequest of the file extensions/bluebubbles/src/monitor.ts of the component bluebubbles Webhook. Performing a manipulation results in improper authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2026.2.12 is sufficient to resolve this issue. The patch is named a6653be0265f1f02b9de46c06f52ea7c81a836e6. The affected component should be upgraded.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn improper authentication vulnerability exists in the handleBlueBubblesWebhookRequest function of the bluebubbles Webhook component in OpenClaw. This allows remote attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms. The vulnerability affects versions up to 2026.1.24.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2026.2.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenClay installation and versionLocate the OpenClay installation directory and check the version file or binary version information. Common locations include /opt/openclaw, /usr/local/openclaw, or the application data directory. Run: openclaw --version or check package.json/version.txt in the installation root.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2026.2.12
-
Confirm bluebubbles Webhook component is enabledExamine the OpenClay configuration files for the bluebubbles webhook feature. Look for settings like 'bluebubbles', 'webhook', or 'bluebubbles_webhook' in config.json, settings.json, or .env files within the OpenClay configuration directory.Affected if The bluebubbles webhook feature is explicitly enabled or configured in the OpenClay configuration
-
Verify webhook endpoint is exposedCheck the OpenClay server configuration or API routes to determine if the webhook endpoint is publicly accessible. Look for routes matching /webhook/bluebubbles or similar patterns in the server configuration files.Affected if The webhook endpoint is exposed and reachable from external networks
-
Inspect the monitor.ts source file for the vulnerabilityIf source code is available, examine extensions/bluebubbles/src/monitor.ts and locate the handleBlueBubblesWebhookRequest function. Check for missing authentication validation or credential checks within this function.Affected if The handleBlueBubblesWebhookRequest function lacks proper authentication validation logic
You are affected if OpenClay version is below 2026.2.12 AND the bluebubbles webhook component is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2026.2.12
Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.2.12 or later to apply the authentication fix. This is a critical (CVSS 9.8) vulnerability requiring immediate action.
2026.2.12
- Ensure you have a backup of your current OpenClaw installation and data
- Locate your current OpenClaw installation directory
- Check your current version to confirm it is below 2026.2.12
- Download OpenClaw version 2026.2.12 from the official repository or release channel
- Stop any running OpenClaw services or processes
- Install version 2026.2.12, replacing the previous installation
- Verify the installation was successful by checking the version
- Restart OpenClaw services
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8305 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8305 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data