Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-8698

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Cryptocurrency Prijsvergelijking Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in version 1.0. This is due to insufficient output escaping in the as_get_coin_shortcode() function, which renders the 'width' (and 'height') shortcode attribute directly into the style attribute of an <iframe> element without applying any escaping function such as esc_attr(). An attacker-controlled value like '100px;"onload="alert(1)" x="' terminates the style attribute prematurely and injects an arbitrary HTML attribute into the iframe tag. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cryptocurrency Prijsvergelijking Widget plugin for WordPress fails to escape the 'width' and 'height' shortcode attributes in the as_get_coin_shortcode() function, rendering them directly into an iframe's style attribute without sanitization. Attackers with contributor-level access can inject malicious attribute values like '100px;"onload="alert(1)" x="' to achieve stored XSS execution.

MitigationApply esc_attr() or equivalent escaping functions to the width and height parameter values before embedding them into the iframe HTML output.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and look for 'Cryptocurrency Prijsvergelijking Widget' in the installed plugins list
    Affected if The plugin is not installed in WordPress
  2. Check the plugin version
    Click on the plugin in the Plugins list to view its version details, then compare against any known vulnerable version numbers
    Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version
  3. Locate the vulnerable function
    Access the plugin files via FTP or File Manager, navigate to the plugin directory, and search for the function 'as_get_coin_shortcode' in PHP files
    Affected if The function exists and contains iframe output with width/height attributes
  4. Inspect pages using the shortcode
    Search post content for the shortcode (typically [coin] or similar) that accepts width and height attributes, then view the page source to inspect the rendered iframe HTML
    Affected if The iframe style attribute contains raw, unescaped width/height values that could contain quotes or JavaScript payloads
  5. Check for contributor-level users
    Go to Users > All Users in WordPress admin and review user roles; contributor role or higher can exploit this vulnerability
    Affected if At least one user with contributor-level or higher access exists who could inject malicious shortcode content

A user is affected if the Cryptocurrency Prijsvergelijking Widget plugin is installed, contains the unpatched as_get_coin_shortcode function, and outputs iframe HTML with unsanitized width/height attributes in the style tag.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply esc_attr() or equivalent escaping functions to the width and height parameter values before embedding them into the iframe HTML output.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8698 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data