CVE-2026-8845
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Islamic Database plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'islamicDB-roqya' shortcode in versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user-supplied 'width' and 'height' shortcode attributes within the islamicDB_sc_quran_qari_roqya() function, which are concatenated directly into HTML iframe attribute values. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Islamic Database WordPress plugin has a stored XSS vulnerability in the islamicDB_sc_quran_qari_roqya() function where the 'width' and 'height' shortcode attributes are directly concatenated into HTML iframe attribute values without sanitization or escaping, allowing authenticated attackers with contributor+ access to inject malicious scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the Islamic Database plugin is installedCheck wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named 'islamic-database', 'islamic_db', or similar. In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Islamic Database' or 'Quran Qari Roqya' related plugins.Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually named index.php, main.php, or islamic-db.php in the plugin folder) and look for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block at the top. Alternatively, check the plugin row in WordPress Plugins admin page.Affected if Version is unknown or within any range that includes unpatched code (the vulnerability exists in unpatched versions)
-
Locate the vulnerable shortcode functionSearch the plugin files for the function 'islamicDB_sc_quran_qari_roqya' or look for shortcode registration containing 'quran_qari_roqya' or similar. The function is typically in the main plugin file or a file handling shortcodes.Affected if The function exists in the plugin code and processes shortcode attributes
-
Inspect the width/height attribute handlingExamine the islamicDB_sc_quran_qari_roqya function code. Look for how 'width' and 'height' attributes are handled when building the iframe HTML tag. Check if esc_attr(), esc_html(), or any sanitization function wraps these values.Affected if The width/height attributes are directly concatenated into the iframe tag without esc_attr() or similar escaping (e.g., looks like '<iframe ... width="' . $width . '" height="' . $height . '" ...>')
-
Determine if the shortcode is in useCheck WordPress pages, posts, or widgets for the presence of the shortcode (typically [quran_qari_roqya] or similar) in content. Use WordPress search or database query on wp_posts for the shortcode string.Affected if The shortcode is actively used on any published content
A user is affected if the Islamic Database plugin is installed, contains the vulnerable function handling width/height attributes without escaping, and the shortcode is in use on the site.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict numeric validation and sanitization for width/height attributes, then apply proper HTML attribute escaping (such as esc_attr()) when outputting these values into iframe tags.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8845 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8845 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data