CVE-2026-8875
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'code' (and 'c') shortcode in versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied shortcode attributes in the shortcode() function, which concatenates the first positional attribute directly into the class attribute of the generated <pre>/<code> HTML without calling esc_attr() or any other escaping function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter WordPress plugin fails to escape the first positional shortcode attribute before inserting it into the class attribute of generated <pre>/<code> HTML elements. An authenticated attacker with contributor-level access can inject arbitrary JavaScript by supplying a malicious attribute value (e.g., [code"><script>alert(1)</script>]), which executes whenever users view pages containing the injected shortcode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installation and activation statusNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and confirm Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter is installed and activeAffected if Plugin is installed and active with no known patched version confirmed
-
Identify installed plugin versionCheck the plugin version listed in the Plugins admin page or inspect the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/easy-prism-syntax-highlighter/ directoryAffected if Installed version is unknown or predates the security fix (no fixed version specified in advisory)
-
Search for shortcode usage in contentQuery the wp_posts table for occurrences of the [prism] or [code] shortcode, or use WP CLI: wp post list --post_type=any --search='[prism' --format=idsAffected if Shortcodes from this plugin are present in any published posts, pages, or custom post types
-
Inspect shortcode attributes in contentExamine the shortcode syntax in affected posts; specifically look for the first positional attribute (content between opening bracket and first space) for unusual characters like quotes, angle brackets, or script tagsAffected if The first positional shortcode attribute contains unsanitized user input such as quote characters followed by event handlers or script tags (e.g., [code"><script>...] or [code" onmouseover=...])
Your environment is affected if the Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter plugin is active, the installed version lacks the security fix, and the vulnerable shortcode with an injectable first attribute exists in any published content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest version of the plugin when available, or modify the shortcode() function to wrap the first positional attribute with esc_attr() before concatenating it into the HTML class. Audit existing posts/pages for existing injections.
Any version above 1.0.2 (check WordPress plugin repository for latest stable release)
- Check the current version of the Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter plugin installed on the WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate Easy Prism Syntax Highlighter and verify current version is 1.0.2 or below
- Update the plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository
- Verify the update completes successfully
- Test that the 'code' and 'c' shortcodes function correctly after the update
- Ensure any pages using the shortcode are rendering correctly with proper HTML escaping
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8875 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8875 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data