SecurlyApplication

CVE-2026-8876

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Version 3.0.7 of the Securly Chrome Extension contains hardcoded, plaintext AES passphrases in securly.min.js. These keys decrypt crisis alert keyword data and intervention site data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Securly Chrome Extension version 3.0.7 contains hardcoded AES passphrases in plaintext within the securly.min.js file. These keys are used to decrypt crisis alert keyword data and intervention site data. Attackers can extract these keys from the extension code and decrypt the sensitive data that was intended to be protected.

MitigationRemove all hardcoded AES passphrases from the extension code and implement a secure key management solution, such as retrieving encryption keys from a trusted server-side service at runtime rather than embedding them in client-side JavaScript.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SecurlyApplication
Affected:= 3.0.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Securly Chrome Extension is installed
    Open Chrome and navigate to chrome://extensions/ or check for the Securly extension in the browser toolbar. On Windows, the extension files are typically located in %LOCALAPPDATA%\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default\Extensions\. On macOS, check ~/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/Default/Extensions/.
    Affected if The Securly extension is present in the browser or filesystem
  2. Check the installed extension version
    In Chrome://extensions/, enable Developer mode, then find Securly and read the version number from the extension details. Alternatively, check the manifest.json file in the extension folder for the 'version' field.
    Affected if Version is exactly 3.0.7
  3. Locate the securly.min.js file
    Navigate to the Securly extension folder in the Chrome extensions directory. The file is named securly.min.js and is typically found in the root of the extension folder.
    Affected if The securly.min.js file exists in the extension directory
  4. Search for hardcoded AES keys in securly.min.js
    Open securly.min.js with a text editor or use grep to search for AES-related strings such as 'AES', 'encrypt', 'decrypt', 'key', 'passphrase', or cryptographic key patterns (typically 16, 24, or 32 character strings used as encryption keys). Look for plaintext strings that appear to be encryption keys or passwords.
    Affected if Hardcoded plaintext AES encryption keys or passphrases are found in the file (strings used as encryption keys that are embedded directly in the code)

The environment is affected if the Securly Chrome Extension version 3.0.7 is installed and the securly.min.js file contains hardcoded plaintext AES encryption keys that can be used to decrypt sensitive data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remove all hardcoded AES passphrases from the extension code and implement a secure key management solution, such as retrieving encryption keys from a trusted server-side service at runtime rather than embedding them in client-side JavaScript.

Fix this in Securly Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8876 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8876 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data