CVE-2026-8926
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen asking curl to use a `.netrc` file to find credentials and at the same time specifying a URL with a username(without a password), like `https://[email protected]/`, curl could wrongly get and use the password for *another* user set in the `.netrc` file for that host if such a one exists and there is no match for the specified user.
In the news
Third-party coverage- 25-Year-Old Vulnerability Patched in Curl - SecurityWeek
- Curl Fixes a 25-Year-Old Bug in Its Largest CVE Release Yet
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn curl's .netrc credential handling, when a URL specifies a username without a password (e.g., https://[email protected]/), curl incorrectly retrieves and uses the password for a different user defined in the .netrc file for that host if no exact username match exists. This causes authentication credentials to be sent to the wrong user account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.11.1, < 8.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine curl versionRun `curl --version` and note the version number displayed (typically on the first line)Affected if The version shown is greater than or equal to 8.11.1 and less than 8.21.0
-
Identify .netrc file usageCheck for existence of .netrc (Linux/macOS) or _netrc (Windows) in the home directory, and verify whether curl is being invoked with the --netrc or --netrc-optional flag, or if NETRC environment variable is set to 'optional' or 'forced'Affected if A .netrc or _netrc file exists and curl is configured to use it (default behavior or explicit --netrc flag)
-
Check for URLs with username but no passwordReview application code, scripts, or configuration files that invoke curl to identify URLs in the format https://username@hostname/ (where password is not included in the URL)Affected if curl is being used with URLs that specify a username but no password in the URL itself
-
Examine .netrc credentials for the target hostIf a vulnerable URL targets a specific host, examine the .netrc file and look for that host entry; check whether multiple user entries exist for the same host or whether the username in the URL does not exactly match any username defined in .netrc for that hostAffected if The target host has a .netrc entry with a username that does not exactly match the username in the URL being used, or multiple users are defined for that host
You are affected if your curl version is between 8.11.1 and 8.21.0 (exclusive), you use .netrc for credentials, and you invoke curl with URLs containing a username but no password for a host where the .netrc file either has no matching username or has multiple user entries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.21.0
Avoid using .netrc files with URLs containing usernames; instead specify passwords in the URL or use environment variables. Apply curl security updates when available.
curl 8.21.0 or later
- Check the current curl version installed (e.g., `curl --version` or `rpm -q curl` / `dpkg -l curl`)
- Upgrade curl to version 8.21.0 or later using your system's package manager (e.g., `apt-get update && apt-get install curl`, `yum update curl`, or `brew upgrade curl`)
- Verify the upgraded version is 8.21.0 or later by running `curl --version`
- Test that .netrc credential handling works correctly with the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8926 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8926 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data