CVE-2026-8927
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen reusing a libcurl handle for sequential transfers driven by environment-variable proxy configuration, libcurl fails to clear the proxy authentication state between requests. Specifically, if the initial transfer authenticates against `proxyA` using Digest auth, a subsequent transfer routed through `proxyB` erroneously leaks the `Proxy-Authorization:` header intended solely for `proxyA`.
In the news
Third-party coverageSurfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWhen reusing a libcurl handle for sequential transfers using environment-variable proxy configuration, libcurl fails to clear proxy authentication state between requests. If the initial transfer authenticates to proxyA using Digest auth, subsequent transfers routed through proxyB erroneously leak the Proxy-Authorization header intended only for proxyA, causing credential disclosure to unintended proxy servers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.12.0, < 8.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed libcurl versionRun `curl --version` to display version information, or programmatically check via `curl_version()` APIAffected if Version is greater than or equal to 7.12.0 AND less than 8.21.0
-
Verify proxy environment variables are setInspect environment variables HTTP_PROXY, HTTPS_PROXY, ALL_PROXY (and lowercase variants) using `env | grep -i proxy` or `printenv`Affected if Any proxy-related environment variables are set to a non-empty value
-
Identify curl handle reuse pattern in applicationReview application source code or runtime behavior for patterns where a curl easy handle is created once and used for multiple transfer operationsAffected if Application reuses the same CURL handle across multiple requests without calling curl_easy_reset() or curl_easy_setopt(CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH, ...) between transfers
-
Confirm proxy authentication is in useCheck application code or logs for CURLOPT_PROXYAUTH, CURLOPT_PROXYUSERPWD options, or trace network traffic for Proxy-Authorization headersAffected if Application uses Digest, Basic, NTLM, or other proxy authentication methods
-
Detect cross-proxy request scenarioMonitor or log which proxy each request uses, checking if different proxy endpoints are accessed using the same handle over timeAffected if The same curl handle is used to send requests through different proxy servers
You are affected if your curl version is >= 7.12.0 and < 8.21.0 AND you reuse curl handles across requests while using environment-variable-configured proxies with authentication, particularly when switching between different proxy servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.21.0
Avoid reusing libcurl handles across different proxy configurations, or explicitly clear authentication state between requests. Monitor for credential leakage to unauthorized proxies. Apply vendor patches when available.
curl/libcurl 8.21.0 or later
- Identify all systems and applications using libcurl versions >= 7.12.0 and < 8.21.0
- Upgrade curl/libcurl to version 8.21.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'curl --version' and confirming the version is >= 8.21.0
- If using libcurl programmatically, rebuild any applications that link against libcurl to ensure they use the updated library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-8927 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-8927 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data