CVE-2026-9003
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedE-LAN Hybrid Recording System developed by TONNET has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read database contents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe E-LAN Hybrid Recording System by TONNET contains a SQL injection vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of user input in database queries without parameterized queries, enabling attackers to read sensitive database contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm E-LAN Hybrid Recording System deploymentIdentify if the E-LAN Hybrid Recording System by TONNET is installed in your environment. Check running services, installed applications, or asset inventories for this specific product name.Affected if The system runs E-LAN Hybrid Recording System by TONNET software.
-
Verify web interface network exposureDetermine if the web management interface of the E-LAN Hybrid Recording System is accessible from network locations. Use netstat, firewall rules, or port scans to identify exposed HTTP/HTTPS services.Affected if The web interface is directly accessible from untrusted networks (e.g., the internet or less-trusted internal segments).
-
Review application logs for SQL errorsExamine application and web server logs for the E-LAN Hybrid Recording System for SQL syntax error messages, database connection errors, or unusual SQL statement patterns in request logs.Affected if Logs contain SQL error messages or evidence of malformed SQL queries being executed.
-
Inspect HTTP responses for SQL injection anomaliesTest the web interface input fields with simple SQL injection test strings (such as single quotes) and observe whether error messages reveal database structure or SQL syntax.Affected if Input fields return database error messages or expose SQL syntax in HTTP responses.
You are affected if the E-LAN Hybrid Recording System by TONNET is running and its web interface accepts unsanitized SQL input that triggers database errors or allows arbitrary SQL command execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations, apply strict input validation and sanitization, and conduct a comprehensive code review to identify and remediate all SQL injection points.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9003 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9003 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data