CVE-2026-9024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting Process Experience Studio in DELMIA Service Process Engineer from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2026x could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Process Experience Studio within DELMIA Service Process Engineer across 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x through R2026x releases. The vulnerability allows malicious script code to be persisted in the application and executed in the context of other users' browser sessions when the stored content is rendered.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify DELMIA Service Process Engineer installationLocate the DELMIA installation directory or check system for Service Process Engineer application files. On Windows, common paths include C:\Program Files\Dassault Systemes\ or check via Add/Remove Programs.Affected if DELMIA Service Process Engineer is installed on the system
-
Identify Process Experience Studio componentCheck for the presence of Process Experience Studio module within the DELMIA installation. Look for folders or files named 'ProcessExperienceStudio', 'ProcessStudio', or similar within the DELMIA directory structure.Affected if Process Experience Studio component is present in the installation
-
Check application versionWithin the DELMIA installation, locate version information - typically in a 'version.xml', 'info.txt', or accessed via the application's About dialog. Compare your version against the affected release timeline for Service Process Engineer.Affected if The installed version of Service Process Engineer matches or predates the vulnerable release that contains Process Experience Studio with XSS flaws
-
Identify web interface or exported content exposureDetermine if Process Experience Studio is configured to generate web-accessible content, exported documents, or collaborative views where user-created process content is rendered to other users.Affected if Process Experience Studio content is exposed via web interface, exports, or shared with other users (stored XSS requires the malicious content to be rendered to victims)
-
Inspect user content storage and renderingExamine the data storage locations where Process Experience Studio saves user-created content. Check how user-supplied process data, annotations, or descriptions are stored and subsequently rendered when accessed by other users.Affected if User-supplied content in Process Experience Studio is stored without proper sanitization and rendered to other users without context-aware encoding
A defender is affected if DELMIA Service Process Engineer with Process Experience Studio is installed, the vulnerable component is enabled or exposed to other users, and user-created content can be rendered to victim browsers without output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches for the affected 3DEXPERIENCE releases. Until patches are available, implement output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied content rendered by Process Experience Studio.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data