CVE-2026-9071
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 and IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 are vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by sending a specially-crafted request. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the server to consume memory resources.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a memory exhaustion denial of service vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server (traditional 8.5, 9.0) and WebSphere Liberty (17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6). A remote attacker can send specially-crafted HTTP requests that cause excessive memory consumption, potentially leading to service unavailability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5.0.0, < 8.5.5.30>= 9.0.0.0, < 9.0.5.29>= 17.0.0.3, < 26.0.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the WebSphere product typeDetermine if you are running IBM WebSphere Application Server traditional or WebSphere Liberty. Check the installation directory: traditional typically under IBM/WebSphere/AppServer, Liberty under wlp/ or similar.Affected if Running either traditional WebSphere or Liberty without knowing which
-
Check the installed WebSphere versionFor traditional: look in AboutWebSphere Application Server version details or run 'versionInfo -version' command. For Liberty: check the version in the usr/servers/<serverName>/logs/message.log or run 'bin/server version <serverName>'. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: traditional 8.5.0.0 to 8.5.5.29, 9.0.0.0 to 9.0.5.28; Liberty 17.0.0.3 to 26.0.0.6.Affected if Installed version falls within 8.5.0.0-8.5.5.29, 9.0.0.0-9.0.5.28 (traditional), or 17.0.0.3-26.0.0.6 (Liberty)
-
Confirm HTTP endpoints are exposedReview server.xml (Liberty) or http.xml/plugin-cfg.xml (traditional) to verify HTTP channels or web containers are enabled and accessible from the network.Affected if HTTP or web container is enabled and reachable from external or untrusted networks
-
Verify memory monitoring is in placeCheck if WebSphere health monitoring, IBM Tivoli, or external monitoring tools are configured to alert on abnormal JVM heap memory usage.Affected if No memory consumption alerts are configured, leaving memory exhaustion undetected
You are affected if you run WebSphere traditional 8.5.x below 8.5.5.30 or 9.0.x below 9.0.5.29, or Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6, with HTTP endpoints exposed and no memory monitoring to detect the exhaustion pattern.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.5.309.0.5.2926.0.0.7
Apply IBM's security patches for this vulnerability. Implement request rate limiting and monitoring for abnormal memory consumption patterns as a compensating control until patches can be applied.
WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.30, 9.0.5.29, or Liberty 26.0.0.7 (depending on your product line)
- For WebSphere Application Server 8.5.x: Upgrade to version 8.5.5.30 or later
- For WebSphere Application Server 9.0.x: Upgrade to version 9.0.5.29 or later
- For WebSphere Application Server Liberty: Upgrade to version 26.0.0.7 or later
- After upgrading, restart the WebSphere Application Server to apply the changes
- Verify the server starts successfully and monitor for normal memory consumption
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9071 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9071 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data