InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2026-9302

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was determined in 546669204 vps-inventory-monitoring up to 98c00b370668c96ae75e91c15548d9ea113652d9. This issue affects the function eval of the file app/index/command/VpsTest.php of the component VpsTest Console. Executing a manipulation of the argument vf can lead to code injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A code injection vulnerability exists in the VpsTest Console component of vps-inventory-monitoring. The 'vf' argument passed to the eval() function in app/index/command/VpsTest.php is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code. This is a critical security flaw as eval() directly executes strings as code.

MitigationReplace the eval() usage with safe alternatives such as a whitelist approach, parameterized processing, or refactored logic that does not require dynamic code execution. Implement strict input validation on the 'vf' argument before any processing occurs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the vulnerable VpsTest component file
    Search for the file app/index/command/VpsTest.php in your application installation directory. This is the file containing the vulnerable eval() call.
    Affected if The file exists in your environment - the application uses this console component.
  2. Identify if the eval() vulnerability is present
    Open app/index/command/VpsTest.php and search for eval() calls that process the 'vf' parameter without sanitization. Look for patterns like eval($vf) or eval($_GET['vf']).
    Affected if The code contains an eval() call directly using the 'vf' user input parameter without validation or sanitization functions.
  3. Check if the VpsTest console is accessible
    Determine if the VpsTest console component is exposed via web access or CLI. Check routing/console configuration files for VpsTest command registration and access controls.
    Affected if The VpsTest console command is accessible without proper authentication or access restrictions.
  4. Determine application version
    Check your installed version of vps-inventory-monitoring by reviewing version files, composer.json, or git tags in the application root directory.
    Affected if Your installed version matches or predates the version containing this vulnerability (compare against the version that includes the fix for CVE-2026-9302).

You are affected if the VpsTest.php file exists with an unsanitized eval() processing the 'vf' parameter, and this console component is accessible to unauthenticated or untrusted users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the eval() usage with safe alternatives such as a whitelist approach, parameterized processing, or refactored logic that does not require dynamic code execution. Implement strict input validation on the 'vf' argument before any processing occurs.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9302 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data