CVE-2026-9320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 and IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 are vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by sending a specially-crafted request. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the server to consume memory resources.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM WebSphere Application Server (traditional 8.5, 9.0) and Liberty (17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6) contain a denial of service vulnerability where a remote attacker can send specially-crafted requests causing excessive memory consumption on the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5.0.0, < 8.5.5.30>= 9.0.0.0, < 9.0.5.29>= 17.0.0.3, < 26.0.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebSphere product type and versionFor traditional WebSphere, run 'versionInfo.sh' (Linux/AIX) or 'versionInfo.bat' (Windows) from the install_root/bin directory. For Liberty, check the version in the server.xml file or run 'server version' from the Liberty bin directory.Affected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: traditional 8.5.0.0-8.5.5.29, 9.0.0.0-9.0.5.28, or Liberty 17.0.0.3-26.0.0.6
-
Verify traditional WebSphere fix pack levelLocate the installation root directory and check the product version in the /properties/version directory or via the administrative console under 'Server > Server1 > Version' information.Affected if The fix pack is below 8.5.5.30 for 8.5.x versions or below 9.0.5.29 for 9.0.x versions
-
Verify Liberty versionCheck the liberty version by running 'java -jar wlp-*.jar --version' or 'server version --verbose' against the running server. Also inspect the server.xml for version information in the <server> element.Affected if The Liberty version is 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6 inclusive
-
Confirm server is network exposedReview network configuration to determine if the WebSphere HTTP port (default 9080 for traditional, 9080 for Liberty) is accessible from external networks or untrusted zones.Affected if The HTTP listener is exposed to remote attackers (not localhost-only or behind a protected network)
You are affected if your WebSphere traditional version is 8.5.0.0-8.5.5.29 or 9.0.0.0-9.0.5.28, or Liberty version is 17.0.0.3-26.0.0.6, and the server HTTP port is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.5.309.0.5.2926.0.0.7
Apply IBM security patches for this vulnerability when released; implement request rate limiting and memory consumption monitoring as interim controls.
WebSphere Application Server 8.5.5.30+ / 9.0.5.29+ / Liberty 26.0.0.7+
- 1. Determine your current WebSphere Application Server version by checking the installation directory or using the versionInfo command
- 2. Identify the appropriate fix pack for your release: For 8.5.x, upgrade to 8.5.5.30 or later; For 9.0.x, upgrade to 9.0.5.29 or later; For Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.6, upgrade to 26.0.0.7 or later
- 3. Download the corresponding fix pack from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral) or through your IBM Support account
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window and back up your current WebSphere installation and configuration
- 5. Apply the fix pack following IBM's installation instructions (using Installation Manager or the update installer)
- 6. Restart the WebSphere Application Server services
- 7. Verify the server starts successfully and the version now reflects the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data