Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2026-9343

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A weakness has been identified in Edimax EW-7438RPn up to 1.31. The affected element is the function formWpsStart of the file /goform/formWpsStart of the component webs. This manipulation of the argument pinCode causes os command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OS command injection vulnerability in the Edimax EW-7438RPn Wi-Fi range extender's web interface. The formWpsStart function accepts user input through the pinCode parameter and passes it unsanitized to a system call, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary shell commands on the device.

MitigationSince Edimax did not respond and no patch is available, recommend device replacement with a supported model. If immediate replacement is not feasible, isolate the device on a restricted network segment and disable WPS if possible to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Access the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is Edimax EW-7438RPn
    Affected if Device model is not EW-7438RPn, then not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Check firmware version
    Log into the device web interface (typically 192.168.1.1) and navigate to System Settings or Status page to view the firmware version; alternatively, inspect the firmware binary if extracted
    Affected if Firmware version is 1.31 or lower (any version up to and including 1.31)
  3. Verify WPS functionality is enabled
    Access the device web interface and check WPS settings under Wireless or Wi-Fi settings; look for WPS enable/disable toggle
    Affected if WPS is enabled - the command injection only affects the WPS PIN functionality
  4. Confirm vulnerable endpoint is accessible
    Attempt to access the URI /goform/formWpsStart on the device (HTTP POST with pinCode parameter); check if the web interface responds
    Affected if The /goform/formWpsStart endpoint is accessible and responds to requests - indicates the vulnerable web service is running
  5. Check network exposure
    Determine if the device management interface is exposed to untrusted networks (WAN/internet) by reviewing router/firewall rules and port forwarding settings
    Affected if Device web interface is accessible from untrusted networks (WAN-facing), increasing exploitation likelihood

User is affected if they have an Edimax EW-7438RPn device running firmware version 1.31 or lower with WPS enabled and the device web interface is accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since Edimax did not respond and no patch is available, recommend device replacement with a supported model. If immediate replacement is not feasible, isolate the device on a restricted network segment and disable WPS if possible to reduce attack surface.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9343 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9343 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data