CVE-2026-9493
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedService Center developed by BankPro E-Service Technology has an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to modify the parameter of a specific query function to access other users' EC order details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceService Center by BankPro E-Service Technology contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in its query function. Authenticated remote attackers can modify parameters in a specific query function to access EC order details belonging to other users, due to missing or inadequate authorization validation on the resource access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Service Center installationLocate the Service Center application installed in your environment. Check for BankPro E-Service Technology components in your application inventory or installed software list.Affected if Service Center by BankPro E-Service Technology is present in the environment
-
Identify the order query API endpointReview API documentation or traffic logs to locate the query function endpoint used for retrieving EC order details. Common patterns include endpoints with 'order', 'query', or 'ec' in the path.Affected if The order query API endpoint exists and is accessible
-
Check if API requires authenticationInspect the API endpoint for authentication requirements. Attempt to access the order query endpoint without valid credentials to determine if authentication is enforced.Affected if The endpoint accepts authenticated requests but lacks proper authorization checks
-
Test IDOR vulnerability with parameter manipulationUsing a valid authenticated session, modify the order ID parameter in API requests to reference an order ID that does not belong to the current user. Compare responses to determine if unauthorized order data is returned.Affected if Manipulating order ID parameters returns EC order details belonging to other users
-
Verify authorization is missing on object referencesCheck server-side code or API configuration for authorization logic that validates the requesting user owns or has permission to access the specific order before returning data.Affected if No server-side authorization validation exists for order object references
If Service Center is installed and the order query API allows authenticated users to access other users' orders by manipulating object IDs without proper ownership verification, the environment is affected by this IDOR vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks in the query function to verify the requesting user has explicit rights to access the requested order records, such as validating user ownership or implementing row-level access control.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9493 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9493 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data