CVE-2026-9497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in changmingxie tcc-transaction up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function Fastjson.parseObject of the component Fastjson AutoType REST API. This manipulation causes deserialization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDeserialization vulnerability in Fastjson AutoType REST API within tcc-transaction library up to v2.1.0. Attackers can exploit Fastjson.parseObject via crafted JSON payloads to achieve remote code execution through unsafe deserialization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if tcc-transaction is in useSearch project dependencies, build files (pom.xml, build.gradle), or deployed artifacts for 'tcc-transaction' or 'changmingxie'Affected if The library is present in dependencies or deployed
-
Check the installed versionLocate the tcc-transaction JAR file or dependency declaration and identify the version number; compare to v2.1.0Affected if Version is 2.1.0 or lower (any version up to and including 2.1.0)
-
Confirm Fastjson library is presentSearch for fastjson JAR files in the deployment or fastjson dependencies in build configurationAffected if Fastjson library is included in the project dependencies
-
Verify AutoType is enabled in Fastjson configurationInspect configuration files, application properties/yaml, or Java code for FastjsonParserConfig settings; look for 'autoTypeSupport' set to true or ParserConfig.getGlobalInstance().setAutoTypeSupport(true) callsAffected if AutoType support is explicitly enabled (set to true)
-
Check if REST API endpoint is exposedReview application endpoints, controller mappings, or network exposure settings to determine if the Fastjson REST API component is accessibleAffected if REST API endpoints using Fastjson.parseObject are externally accessible
User is affected if tcc-transaction version 2.1.0 or lower is in use AND Fastjson AutoType is enabled AND the REST API is exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade tcc-transaction beyond v2.1.0 or disable Fastjson AutoType feature; if upgrade unavailable, implement strict input validation and network segmentation to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data