CVE-2026-9512
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Totolink CA750-PoE 6.2c.510. This vulnerability affects the function setPasswordCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Setting Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument admuser/admpass results in os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in Totolink CA750-PoE device firmware 6.2c.510. The setPasswordCfg function in /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi accepts user-controlled admuser and admpass parameters that are unsafely passed to system shell commands, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the device web interface or check device label/marketing to confirm it is a Totolink CA750-PoE deviceAffected if Device is not a Totolink CA750-PoE (different model or manufacturer)
-
Check firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the system status or firmware version page, or use the command 'cat /proc/version' or 'ver' via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if Firmware version is 6.2c.510 or earlier (the vulnerable version)
-
Verify web interface is accessibleAttempt to access http://[device-ip]/cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi from a browser or curl commandAffected if The cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi endpoint responds (device web interface is enabled and reachable)
-
Confirm setPasswordCfg function existsSend a POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi with a test payload for the admuser parameter (e.g., admuser=';ls;') and observe if command execution occursAffected if The device executes arbitrary commands injected into admuser or admpass parameters (vulnerable to command injection)
The device is affected if it is a Totolink CA750-PoE running firmware version 6.2c.510 or earlier and the web interface is accessible, allowing command injection via the setPasswordCfg function in cstecgi.cgi.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the device's web interface, disable remote administration if possible, and monitor for indicators of compromise.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9512 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data