CVE-2026-9552
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security flaw has been discovered in Das Parking Management System 停车场管理系统 6.2.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Search API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Value results in sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Das Parking Management System 6.2.0 Search API Endpoint allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the Value argument. Public exploit available increases urgency.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Das Parking Management System versionLocate the version information in the application (check About page, version file, footer, or API response header) and compare it to 6.2.0Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.2.0 or falls within an unpatched version range based on 6.2.0
-
Locate the Search API endpointIdentify API routes or endpoints that handle search functionality - look for paths containing '/search' or similar patterns in the application's routing configuration or API documentationAffected if The Search API endpoint exists and is accessible in the application
-
Verify the Value parameter is used in Search APIInspect the Search API endpoint parameters and confirm the 'Value' parameter is accepted - check the request schema or parameter validation code for this endpointAffected if The Search API accepts a 'Value' parameter for search queries
-
Check if input validation is absent on Value parameterReview the Search API endpoint code to determine whether the Value parameter is passed directly to a database query without proper sanitization, parameterized queries, or input validationAffected if The Value parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without parameterized handling or input validation
You are affected if you are running Das Parking Management System version 6.2.0 (or an unpatched version based on 6.2.0) and the Search API endpoint with the Value parameter is accessible without additional security controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by implementing parameterized queries/prepared statements in the Search API endpoint and adding proper input validation. Consider WAF deployment as compensating control until code fix is deployed.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,336.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9552 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9552 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data