dbcve.org
InjectionWeakness · CWE-74

CVE-2026-9607

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in itsourcecode Courier Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /parcel_list.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument s results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in the itsourcecode Courier Management System 1.0's parcel_list.php file. The 's' parameter is vulnerable to SQL injection, allowing remote attackers to manipulate database queries. A public exploit exists, indicating the vulnerability is readily exploitable.

MitigationReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements. Input validation should be implemented for the 's' parameter, and a thorough code review should check for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities throughout the application.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Courier Management System installation
    Locate the web application files and check for files indicating itsourcecode Courier Management System, such as login pages, header files, or configuration files showing the application name. Check version information in any README, about page, or config file.
    Affected if The system is running itsourcecode Courier Management System version 1.0
  2. Verify parcel_list.php exists
    Locate the parcel_list.php file within the web root directory or application source code. This file should exist in an accessible web path.
    Affected if The parcel_list.php file is present in the application directory
  3. Check if search parameter 's' is accepted
    Examine the parcel_list.php source code to determine if it processes a GET or POST parameter named 's'. Also check if the application has search or filter functionality that passes this parameter.
    Affected if The application accepts and processes a 's' parameter in parcel_list.php without proper sanitization
  4. Inspect database query implementation
    Review the parcel_list.php code to identify database queries that incorporate the 's' parameter. Look for direct concatenation or insertion of the parameter into SQL statements without using prepared statements or parameter binding.
    Affected if The 's' parameter is directly concatenated into SQL queries without parameterized queries or input escaping
  5. Test for SQL injection vulnerability
    Submit a benign SQL injection test payload (such as a single quote ') in the 's' parameter to parcel_list.php and observe for SQL errors, unexpected behavior, or differences in response compared to normal input.
    Affected if Submitting special characters in the 's' parameter produces SQL errors or alters the application response in ways indicating unsanitized input

A user is affected if they are running itsourcecode Courier Management System 1.0 with parcel_list.php accessible and the 's' parameter accepted without prepared statements or input sanitization.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries or prepared statements. Input validation should be implemented for the 's' parameter, and a thorough code review should check for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities throughout the application.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence
  1. 1. Locate the file /parcel_list.php in the Courier Management System installation
  2. 2. Identify the vulnerable code that processes the 's' parameter without proper sanitization
  3. 3. Implement prepared statements/parameterized queries (e.g., PDO or MySQLi with bind parameters) instead of concatenating user input directly into SQL queries
  4. 4. Apply input validation and escaping for the 's' parameter before using it in database queries
  5. 5. Apply least-privilege database permissions to the application database user
  6. 6. Test the remediation to confirm the SQL injection is mitigated
  7. 7. Deploy the fixed /parcel_list.php to production

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,780
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9607 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data