CVE-2026-9610
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Datacap 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 and IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.7, 9.1.8, and 9.1.9 exposes resources or functionality that isn't linked in the UI but is accessible by directly requesting the URL, bypassing intended access controls.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Datacap 9.1.7-9.1.9 and IBM Datacap Navigator 9.1.7-9.1.9 contain hidden functionality accessible via direct URL requests that bypass UI-based access controls. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or horizontal/vertical privilege escalation issue where unlinked resources expose sensitive operations without proper authorization checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.1.7= 9.1.8= 9.1.9= 9.1.7= 9.1.8= 9.1.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Datacap versionCheck the product version through the Datacap application or Windows Add/Remove Programs. Look for version 9.1.7, 9.1.8, or 9.1.9 specifically.Affected if The installed version is 9.1.7, 9.1.8, or 9.1.9 for either IBM Datacap or IBM Datacap Navigator.
-
Identify installed IBM Datacap Navigator versionCheck the Datacap Navigator component version through the installation directory or Windows Add/Remove Programs.Affected if The installed Datacap Navigator version is 9.1.7, 9.1.8, or 9.1.9.
-
Determine if web interface is accessibleAccess the Datacap or Datacap Navigator web interface URL (typically http://servername:port/ibm/datacap for Datacap or similar paths for Navigator).Affected if The web interface is reachable and the product version is one of the affected versions listed above.
-
Audit for hidden or unlinked URL endpointsReview server logs, application configuration files, and known endpoint patterns to identify any direct URLs that are not exposed in the UI navigation but may exist.Affected if Hidden or unlinked URL endpoints exist and are accessible without additional authorization checks beyond the UI.
You are affected if IBM Datacap or IBM Datacap Navigator version 9.1.7, 9.1.8, or 9.1.9 is installed and the web interface is accessible, as unlinked URLs can be accessed directly bypassing UI-based access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement and enforce consistent authorization checks on all server-side endpoints regardless of UI exposure. Apply IBM patches when available and audit accessible URLs for proper access control enforcement.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9610 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9610 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data