Memory Buffer Bounds ErrorWeakness · CWE-119

CVE-2026-9631

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was detected in UTT HiPER 1250GW up to 3.2.7-210907-180535. Affected by this vulnerability is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW of the component Web Management Interface. Performing a manipulation of the argument Profile results in stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Stack-based buffer overflow in UTT HiPER 1250GW router's web management interface. The strcpy function in /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW handler copies the unsanitized 'Profile' parameter directly to a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking, allowing remote attackers to overflow the stack and potentially achieve code execution.

MitigationApply vendor firmware update if available. Until then, restrict access to the web management interface to trusted internal networks only, or disable the affected form handler if possible via configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Check the device label, web interface footer, or DHCP vendor identifier to confirm the model is UTT HiPER 1250GW
    Affected if The device is not a UTT HiPER 1250GW, then this specific CVE does not apply
  2. Check if web management interface is accessible
    Attempt to access the router's web interface on common ports 80 or 443 (e.g., http://<router-ip>/)
    Affected if The web interface is accessible from an attacker-controlled network segment, indicating potential exposure
  3. Identify the firmware version
    Log into the web interface and look for a System Status, Firmware Version, or About page; alternatively, check the HTTP headers or the footer of any web page for version information
    Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is older than any available patched version (if known)
  4. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Send an HTTP POST request to /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW with a test 'Profile' parameter (e.g., Profile=test) and observe the response
    Affected if The endpoint responds (even with an error), indicating the vulnerable function is present
  5. Check if remote web management is enabled
    Look in the router settings under Remote Management, Web Access, or Administration settings for an option to enable/disable remote HTTP/HTTPS access
    Affected if Remote web management is enabled and the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks

A user is affected if they own a UTT HiPER 1250GW router with an accessible web management interface where the /goform/formConfigFastDirectionW endpoint handles the Profile parameter without bounds checking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware update if available. Until then, restrict access to the web management interface to trusted internal networks only, or disable the affected form handler if possible via configuration.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9631 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data