CVE-2026-9632
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw has been found in UTT HiPER 1250GW up to 3.2.7-210907-180535. Affected by this issue is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formGroupConfig of the component Web Management Interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument Profile can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in UTT HiPER 1250GW router Web Management Interface (versions up to 3.2.7-210907-180535) due to unsafe strcpy() usage in /goform/formGroupConfig. The Profile parameter is copied to a stack buffer without bounds checking, allowing remote attackers to overflow the buffer and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router web management interface and check the device information page, or use network enumeration to identify the exact model (UTT HiPER 1250GW)Affected if The device is not a UTT HiPER 1250GW router
-
Check firmware versionIn the router web interface, navigate to System Status or Device Information to view the firmware version. Compare against the affected range: any version up to and including 3.2.7-210907-180535 is vulnerableAffected if Firmware version is 3.2.7-210907-180535 or earlier
-
Verify remote web management is enabledIn the router web interface, check the Remote Management or Access Control settings. Look for options like 'Enable Remote Management', 'Allow Remote Access', or Web UI access from WANAffected if Remote web management (WAN access) is enabled and the management interface is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Confirm /goform/formGroupConfig endpoint existsSend an HTTP GET or POST request to http://<router-ip>/goform/formGroupConfig. A response (even an error) indicates the endpoint is presentAffected if The /goform/formGroupConfig endpoint responds to requests, indicating the vulnerable function is present
-
Check for indicators of compromiseReview router logs for unusual POST requests to /goform/formGroupConfig with abnormally long Profile parameter values, or look for unexpected new admin accounts or configuration changesAffected if Log analysis reveals suspicious requests to the vulnerable endpoint or unauthorized configuration changes
The device is affected if it is a UTT HiPER 1250GW router running firmware version 3.2.7-210907-180535 or earlier AND remote web management is enabled, allowing external access to the vulnerable /goform/formGroupConfig endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate router firmware to a patched version if available; otherwise disable or restrict access to the web management interface from untrusted networks as a compensating control.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9632 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data