CVE-2026-9803
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Keycloak's ClientRegistrationAuth component. A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted POST request with a malformed 'Authorization: Bearer' header to any client registration endpoint. This can lead to an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, causing the server to return an HTTP 500 error and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the affected service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Keycloak's ClientRegistrationAuth component allows remote unauthenticated attackers to cause a denial of service by sending POST requests with malformed 'Authorization: Bearer' headers to client registration endpoints. The malformed input triggers an unhandled ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException, resulting in HTTP 500 errors and service unavailability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Keycloak is runningCheck for running Keycloak processes or verify the service is listening on its configured port (default 8443 for HTTPS or 8080 for HTTP). Use commands like 'ps aux | grep keycloak' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep -E "(8080|8443)"'Affected if Keycloak process is running and accessible on the network
-
Identify the Client Registration endpoint availabilityAttempt to access the client registration endpoint for your realm. Common paths are /realms/{realm}/clients/registrations or /auth/realms/{realm}/clients/registrations. Use curl or a browser to send a GET request to these endpoints.Affected if The endpoint returns a 200 or 401 response, indicating the client registration service is accessible
-
Verify Client Registration Service is enabledCheck Keycloak configuration files (standalone.xml, standalone-ha.xml, or the Keycloak admin console) for the 'Client Registration' capability. In the admin console, navigate to Realm Settings > Client Registration and confirm it is enabled.Affected if Client Registration Service is enabled and publicly accessible without authentication
-
Test for vulnerability with malformed Authorization headerSend a POST request to the client registration endpoint with a malformed 'Authorization: Bearer' header that is missing the token value, for example: 'Authorization: Bearer'. Use curl: curl -X POST -H 'Authorization: Bearer' https://keycloak-host/realms/{realm}/clients/registrationsAffected if The server returns an HTTP 500 error with an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in the response or logs
If Keycloak is running with the Client Registration Service enabled and accessible, and malformed Authorization headers cause HTTP 500 errors, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2026-9803.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the official Keycloak security patch when available; in the interim, consider implementing rate limiting or a WAF rule to detect and block malformed Authorization headers before they reach the vulnerable component.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9803 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9803 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data