Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2026-9808

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the Mautic 7 API v2 endpoints (utilizing API Platform). Under certain conditions, roles configured with owner-scope restrictions (such as `viewown` or `editown`) are not properly enforced. This allows low-privilege authenticated API users to bypass ownership-logic controls and access or modify resources belonging to other users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Mautic 7 API v2 endpoints using API Platform fail to enforce owner-scope restrictions (viewown/editown) for configured roles, allowing authenticated low-privilege API users to bypass ownership-logic controls and access or modify resources belonging to other users.

MitigationUntil an official patch is released, restrict or disable API v2 endpoints for affected roles and implement additional application-layer authorization checks to validate ownership before returning or modifying resources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Mautic installation and version
    Check the installed Mautic version by reviewing the version file (typically app/version.txt or similar) or accessing the system information via the admin interface under Settings > System Info
    Affected if The installed version is Mautic 7.x and uses API v2 endpoints with API Platform
  2. Determine if API v2 endpoints are enabled
    Review the Mautic configuration files (config/packages/ folder) for API-related settings, specifically api_enabled and platform_api configurations. Check routes/api_platform.xml or similar routing configuration for active API v2 routes
    Affected if API v2 endpoints using API Platform are enabled and accessible to authenticated users
  3. Identify roles using owner-scope restrictions
    Examine the role/permission configuration in the database (table: permissions) or through the admin interface under Roles & Permissions. Look for roles with viewown or editown permissions on any object type
    Affected if Any roles exist with viewown or editown permissions configured on API-accessible objects
  4. Verify ownership enforcement on API v2 resources
    Test API v2 endpoints with a user having only viewown/editown permissions on a resource they own, then attempt to access or modify a resource owned by a different user using the same API credentials
    Affected if The API allows access to or modification of resources owned by other users when the authenticated user only has owner-scope (viewown/editown) permissions
  5. Check for vendor patch application
    Review the installed files against the CVE-2026-9808 patch source, looking for modified files in the API Platform integration layer (typically in src/Api/ or src/ApiPlatform/ directories)
    Affected if The patch for CVE-2026-9808 has not been applied to the Mautic installation

A user is affected if they run Mautic 7.x with API v2 endpoints enabled and have users with owner-scope (viewown/editown) roles that can bypass ownership restrictions to access or modify other users resources via the API.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Until an official patch is released, restrict or disable API v2 endpoints for affected roles and implement additional application-layer authorization checks to validate ownership before returning or modifying resources.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-9808 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-9808 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data