CVE-1999-0206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMIME buffer overflow in Sendmail 8.8.0 and 8.8.1 gives root access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Sendmail versions 8.8.0 and 8.8.1's MIME parsing functionality allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges by sending specially crafted MIME messages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.8= 8.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Sendmail versionRun 'sendmail -V' or 'sendmail -d0.1' to display the installed Sendmail version. On Linux systems, also try 'rpm -q sendmail' or 'dpkg -l sendmail' if available.Affected if The version displayed is exactly 8.8 or 8.8.1, meaning it matches the affected version range.
-
Confirm MIME processing is enabledExamine the Sendmail configuration file (typically /etc/sendmail.cf or /etc/mail/sendmail.cf) for MIME-related settings. Look for 'MIME-Handle' options or rulesets that handle MIME content types.Affected if MIME parsing support is enabled in the configuration, as the vulnerability resides specifically in Sendmail's MIME parsing code.
-
Check SMTP network exposureReview firewall rules (iptables, ufw, or similar) and Sendmail configuration to determine if port 25 (SMTP) is accessible from untrusted networks.Affected if SMTP port 25 is exposed to external or untrusted networks, allowing remote attackers to deliver specially crafted MIME messages.
Your system is affected if Sendmail version 8.8 or 8.8.1 is installed with MIME support enabled and SMTP is network-accessible, as the vulnerability requires both the affected version and MIME processing to be active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Sendmail to version 8.8.2 or later, or migrate to a modern mail server (Postfix, Exim, or current Sendmail). If immediate patching is impossible, restrict SMTP access to trusted networks as a temporary measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-1999-0206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-1999-0206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data