CVE-2001-0130
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in HTML parser of the Lotus R5 Domino Server before 5.06, and Domino Client before 5.05, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a malformed font size specifier.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the HTML parser of IBM Lotus R5 Domino Server (before 5.06) and Domino Client (before 5.05) allows remote attackers to trigger the overflow via malformed font size specifiers in HTML content, potentially enabling denial of service or arbitrary command execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.04= 5.05= 5.04= 5.05= 5.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Domino versionOpen the Domino Administrator client, or check the server console for version by typing 'show server' or checking the program directory for version files. On Windows, check the registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Lotus\Domino or examine the version.txt in the Domino program folder.Affected if The installed version is 5.04 or 5.05 (or any version before 5.06 for Server, or before 5.05 for Client)
-
Confirm Domino component typeDetermine whether the installation is a Domino Server or Client by reviewing the installed program type and running services.Affected if The system is a Domino Server version 5.04-5.05 or a Domino Client version 5.04-5.05
-
Check if HTML rendering is activeDomino processes HTML by default in web serving (HTTP task), email rendering, and rich text field display. Verify the HTTP task is running on servers: type 'show task' at the server console. For clients, check if HTML email preview or embedded HTML viewing is enabled.Affected if HTTP task is enabled on a Server, or email/rich text features are used on a Client (default enabled states)
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules and network accessibility of the Domino HTTP port (default 80). Check if the server is reachable from untrusted networks using telnet or port scanning to confirm external attack surface.Affected if The Domino HTTP service is accessible from network segments beyond trusted internal users
You are affected if you are running Domino R5 Server versions 5.04 or 5.05, or Domino R5 Client versions 5.04 or 5.05, with HTTP or email processing enabled and network accessibility.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Lotus Domino Server to version 5.06 or later and Domino Client to 5.05 or later. If running these legacy systems is unavoidable, implement strict network filtering to block untrusted HTML content from reaching the affected services.
Lotus Domino R5 Server 5.06 or later; Lotus Domino R5 Client 5.05 or later
- Identify all Lotus Domino R5 Servers in the environment and verify their versions (5.04, 5.05, or 5.06 are vulnerable)
- Identify all Lotus Domino R5 Clients in the environment and verify their versions (5.04 and 5.05 are vulnerable)
- Plan upgrade to Domino Server 5.06 or later for all affected servers
- Plan upgrade to Domino Client 5.05 or later for all affected clients
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Back up all Domino databases and configuration files before upgrading
- Upgrade Domino Server to version 5.06 or later
- Upgrade Domino Client to version 5.05 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-0130 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-0130 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data