Domino Web ServerApplication · Lotus

CVE-2001-0847

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2001-12-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Lotus Domino Web Server 5.x allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information by accessing the default navigator $defaultNav via (1) URL encoding the request, or (2) directly requesting the ReplicaID.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Lotus Domino Web Server 5.x contains a path traversal or information disclosure vulnerability in its default navigator $defaultNav. Remote attackers can access sensitive information by either URL-encoding the request or directly requesting the ReplicaID, bypassing intended access controls.

MitigationGiven this affects Domino 5.x (circa 2001), the primary remediation is to upgrade to a supported Domino version with current patches. If legacy systems must remain in service, implement strict network segmentation and disable the default navigator access patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Domino Web ServerApplication
Affected:= 5.x

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Domino Web Server version
    Check the Domino server version using the command 'show server' in the Domino console or inspect the server's Program directory for version files. Compare against the affected range of 5.x.
    Affected if The installed version is Domino Web Server 5.x (any minor release).
  2. Confirm Web Server service is enabled
    Verify the Domino HTTP task is running. In the Domino console, run 'show task' or check the Server document in the Domino Directory for HTTP enabled status.
    Affected if HTTP task is enabled and serving web requests on port 80/443.
  3. Test $defaultNav navigator accessibility
    Send an HTTP GET request to the server root or a known database path appending '/$defaultNav' or '/$defaultNav?OpenNavigator'. For example: http://target/$defaultNav
    Affected if The request returns navigator content without authentication or returns any database content listing.
  4. Test URL-encoded path traversal
    Send a crafted request with URL-encoded sequences such as '%2e%2e' or encoded null bytes targeting known database paths (e.g., %2e%2e%2fnames.nsf). Observe if the server returns unauthorized content.
    Affected if URL-encoded requests return sensitive information or database contents that should be protected.
  5. Test ReplicaID direct request access
    Attempt to access databases by ReplicaID directly via URL: http://target/replicaid?OpenDatabase. Check if any protected databases become accessible without proper credentials.
    Affected if Direct ReplicaID requests bypass access controls and return sensitive data.

A server is affected if it runs Domino Web Server 5.x with HTTP enabled and the $defaultNav navigator or direct ReplicaID requests are accessible without proper authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Given this affects Domino 5.x (circa 2001), the primary remediation is to upgrade to a supported Domino version with current patches. If legacy systems must remain in service, implement strict network segmentation and disable the default navigator access patterns.

Fix this in Domino Web Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-0847 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-0847 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data