CVE-2001-0245
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft Index Server 2.0 in Windows NT 4.0, and Indexing Service in Windows 2000, allows remote attackers to read server-side include files via a malformed search request, aka a new variant of the "Malformed Hit-Highlighting" vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMicrosoft Index Server 2.0 and Indexing Service contain a vulnerability where remote attackers can read server-side include (SSI) files via malformed search requests. This is a variant of the Malformed Hit-Highlighting vulnerability, allowing unauthorized disclosure of potentially sensitive SSI content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Indexing Service or Index Server is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Indexing Service' or check for the presence of C:\Program Files\Indexing Service folder, or run 'reg query "HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\ISearch"'Affected if The Indexing Service or Index Server service exists on the system
-
Confirm IIS is installed and runningCheck for the existence of IIS via Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager or by attempting to access http://localhost. Also check the World Wide Web Publishing Service is running.Affected if IIS is installed and the WWW service is active, providing the web interface through which the malformed requests could be sent
-
Check for .idq and .ida ISAPI mappingsOpen IIS Manager, right-click the default website or relevant website, select Properties, click Home Directory tab, click Configuration, and examine the Application Mappings for .idq and .ida extensions pointing to idq.dllAffected if The .idq or .ida script mappings are present and enabled, allowing the vulnerable query mechanism to be invoked
-
Identify the exact version of Index ServerIf Index Server 2.0 is installed, check the version of the idq.dll file in C:\Winnt\System32 or C:\Windows\System32, or check Add/Remove Programs for Microsoft Index Server 2.0Affected if Index Server version 2.0 is installed, or any version of Indexing Service is present (all versions are affected)
-
Verify query endpoint is accessible over the networkAttempt to access http://<server>/*.idq or http://<server>/*.ida from a non-localhost address, or review IIS logs for requests to these extensionsAffected if The .idq/.ida endpoints are reachable from network clients, creating the attack vector for remote exploitation
A system is affected if Indexing Service or Index Server is installed, IIS is running with .idq/.ida script mappings enabled, and the query endpoints are network-accessible, allowing remote attackers to send malformed search requests to read SSI files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available Microsoft patches for this vulnerability, or disable Indexing Service if not required. Implement network-level access controls to restrict query access to trusted sources only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-0245 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-0245 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data