ProftpdApplication · Proftpd Project

CVE-2001-1501

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2001-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The glob functionality in ProFTPD 1.2.1, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via commands with large numbers of wildcard and other special characters, as demonstrated using an ls command with multiple (1) "*/..", (2) "*/.*", or (3) ".*./*?/" sequences in the argument.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ProFTPD 1.2.1 (and possibly other versions) contains a denial of service vulnerability in its glob functionality. Remote attackers can trigger excessive CPU and memory consumption by issuing ls commands containing patterns with large numbers of wildcards and special characters, such as '*/..', '*/.*', or '.*./*?/' sequences.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of ProFTPD that addresses this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict FTP access to trusted users via firewall rules or access controls to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ProftpdApplication
Affected:= 1.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if ProFTPD is installed
    Run 'proftpd -v' or 'proftpd -h' to display version information, or check for the binary at common locations like /usr/sbin/proftpd
    Affected if ProFTPD is present on the system and running as a service
  2. Determine the installed ProFTPD version
    Execute 'proftpd -v' or 'ftpctl version' to retrieve the exact version number, or check the package manager for installed proftpd packages
    Affected if The installed version matches 1.2.1 or falls within the affected range provided
  3. Verify the FTP service is running and accessible
    Check if the FTP daemon is listening on port 21 using 'netstat -an | grep :21' or 'ss -tlnp | grep :21'
    Affected if The FTP service is active and exposed to network access, increasing exposure to remote attackers
  4. Look for signs of resource exhaustion from glob processing
    Monitor CPU and memory usage of the proftpd process during glob-heavy ls operations, or review system logs for patterns of '*/..', '*/.*', or '.*./*?/' in ls commands
    Affected if ProFTPD processes exhibit high CPU or memory consumption when processing ls commands with wildcard patterns, indicating the vulnerability is being triggered
  5. Check for anomalous FTP command patterns in logs
    Review ProFTPD access logs for repeated ls commands containing wildcard sequences like '*/', '.*', or '?' characters used in unusual combinations
    Affected if Logs show repeated ls commands with patterns that could exploit the glob DoS vulnerability
  6. Verify glob functionality is enabled in configuration
    Examine the ProFTPD configuration file for any settings related to glob expansion or shell command execution
    Affected if Glob functionality is enabled and the server accepts ls commands from remote users

A system is affected if it runs ProFTPD version 1.2.1 with the FTP service accessible to remote users and glob-based ls command processing enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of ProFTPD that addresses this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict FTP access to trusted users via firewall rules or access controls to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Proftpd Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2001-1501 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2001-1501 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data