CVE-2002-0721
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft SQL Server 7.0 and 2000 installs with weak permissions for extended stored procedures that are associated with helper functions, which could allow unprivileged users, and possibly remote attackers, to run stored procedures with administrator privileges via (1) xp_execresultset, (2) xp_printstatements, or (3) xp_displayparamstmt.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability involves weak permissions on three extended stored procedures (xp_execresultset, xp_printstatements, xp_displayparamstmt) in Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 and 2000. Unprivileged users can execute these procedures to run other stored procedures with administrator or DBO privileges, effectively escalating their permissions on the database system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 2000= 7.0= 2000CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SQL Server versionRun 'SELECT @@VERSION' or check SQL Server service properties to confirm if the version is 7.0 or 2000Affected if The installed version is Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 or 2000, or Microsoft Data Engine (MSDE) 1.0 or 2000
-
Verify vulnerable extended stored procedures existQuery the master database: SELECT name FROM sysobjects WHERE name IN ('xp_execresultset', 'xp_printstatements', 'xp_displayparamstmt') AND xtype = 'X'Affected if Any of these three extended stored procedures (xp_execresultset, xp_printstatements, xp_displayparamstmt) are present in the master database
-
Check execute permissions on xp_execresultsetRun: USE master; SELECT dp.name AS principal, dp.type_desc, perm.permission_name, perm.state_desc FROM sys.database_permissions perm JOIN sys.database_principals dp ON perm.grantee_principal_id = dp.principal_id WHERE perm.major_id = OBJECT_ID('xp_execresultset')Affected if The public role or unprivileged users have EXECUTE permission granted on xp_execresultset
-
Check execute permissions on xp_printstatementsRun: USE master; SELECT dp.name AS principal, dp.type_desc, perm.permission_name, perm.state_desc FROM sys.database_permissions perm JOIN sys.database_principals dp ON perm.grantee_principal_id = dp.principal_id WHERE perm.major_id = OBJECT_ID('xp_printstatements')Affected if The public role or unprivileged users have EXECUTE permission granted on xp_printstatements
-
Check execute permissions on xp_displayparamstmtRun: USE master; SELECT dp.name AS principal, dp.type_desc, perm.permission_name, perm.state_desc FROM sys.database_permissions perm JOIN sys.database_principals dp ON perm.grantee_principal_id = dp.principal_id WHERE perm.major_id = OBJECT_ID('xp_displayparamstmt')Affected if The public role or unprivileged users have EXECUTE permission granted on xp_displayparamstmt
You are affected if you run SQL Server 7.0 or 2000 (or MSDE 1.0 or 2000) AND any of the three vulnerable extended stored procedures exist with execute permissions granted to the public role or unprivileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRevoke or restrict execute permissions on the affected extended stored procedures (xp_execresultset, xp_printstatements, xp_displayparamstmt) from the public role and unprivileged users, and apply the relevant Microsoft security patch for SQL Server.
Microsoft SQL Server 2019 or later / Azure SQL Database (SQL Server 7.0 and 2000 are discontinued with no security patches available)
- 1. Assess current SQL Server environment to confirm version (7.0 or 2000) and identify all instances using the vulnerable extended stored procedures (xp_execresultset, xp_printstatements, xp_displayparamstmt).
- 2. Plan migration to a supported Microsoft SQL Server version (such as SQL Server 2019 or Azure SQL Database) as SQL Server 7.0 and 2000 are discontinued products with no further security updates.
- 3. Before migration, revoke execute permissions from unprivileged users on the vulnerable extended stored procedures as a temporary mitigation: REVOKE EXECUTE ON xp_execresultset FROM public; REVOKE EXECUTE ON xp_printstatements FROM public; REVOKE EXECUTE ON xp_displayparamstmt FROM public.
- 4. Perform comprehensive testing of applications against the new SQL Server version.
- 5. Execute production migration to the supported SQL Server version.
- 6. Apply least-privilege permissions to all extended stored procedures in the new environment.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2002-0721 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2002-0721 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data