CVE-2004-1151
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple buffer overflows in the (1) sys32_ni_syscall and (2) sys32_vm86_warning functions in sys_ia32.c for Linux 2.6.x may allow local attackers to modify kernel memory and gain privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflows in the sys32_ni_syscall and sys32_vm86_warning functions within Linux 2.6.x's 32-bit syscall compatibility layer (sys_ia32.c) allow local attackers to overwrite kernel memory and escalate privileges. This vulnerability exists in the IA32 compatibility subsystem used when running 32-bit applications on 64-bit Linux kernels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.6.0= 2.6.1= 2.6.2= 2.6.3= 2.6.4= 2.6.5= 2.6.6= 2.6.7= 2.6.8= 2.6.9= 2.6.10= 2.6_test9_cvs= 4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to retrieve the running kernel versionAffected if The version begins with 2.6.0 through 2.6.10, or matches 2.6_test9_cvs
-
Confirm IA32 emulation support is enabledCheck if the kernel configuration includes CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y, or inspect /boot/config-$(uname -r) for the CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION settingAffected if CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION is set to y or is built as a loadable module (m) while the module is loaded
-
Verify 32-bit application compatibility layer is activeCheck for the presence of /lib32 or /usr/lib32 directories, or attempt to run a 32-bit binary (file /bin/bash and check for ELF32)Affected if The system can execute 32-bit ELF binaries, indicating the IA32 compatibility layer is functional
-
Identify the specific vulnerable functionsInspect the kernel source file arch/x86_64/ia32/ sys_ia32.c for the sys32_ni_syscall and sys32_vm86_warning functions (requires source access)Affected if The kernel source contains these functions without the upstream patches applied
The system is affected if it runs a Linux 2.6.x kernel from 2.6.0 to 2.6.10 with the IA32 emulation (CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) feature enabled and actively used for 32-bit binary execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the upstream kernel patch or upgrade to a patched kernel version; alternatively, disable IA32 compatibility support (CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) in the kernel configuration if 32-bit binary support is not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-1151 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-1151 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data