ColdfusionApplication · Macromedia

CVE-2004-2204

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2004-12-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Macromedia ColdFusion MX 6.0 and 6.1 application server, when running with the CreateObject function or CFOBJECT tag enabled, allows local users to conduct unauthorized activities and obtain administrative passwords by creating CFML scripts that use CreateObject or CFOBJECT.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ColdFusion MX 6.0 and 6.1 with CreateObject function or CFOBJECT tag enabled allows local users to create malicious CFML scripts that can perform unauthorized activities and obtain administrative passwords, effectively enabling local privilege escalation.

MitigationDisable the CreateObject function and CFOBJECT tag if not required, or migrate to a supported ColdFusion version as these extremely outdated versions (2004 era) are no longer supported and contain known security flaws.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ColdfusionApplication
Affected:= 6.0= 6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ColdFusion installation and version
    Check the ColdFusion installation directory or registry for the installed version number. Look for version indicators in the product name or version files (e.g., check for 'ColdFusion MX 6.0' or 'ColdFusion MX 6.1' in installed program files or registry keys under the Macromedia or Adobe ColdFusion registry entries).
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.0 or 6.1 (matches = 6.0 or = 6.1)
  2. Verify CreateObject function is available
    Attempt to invoke the CreateObject function in a test CFML page or check the ColdFusion Administrator settings for Java/COM object creation privileges. Review the cfconfig.xml or registry for CreateObject enablement settings.
    Affected if CreateObject function is enabled and accessible to users (not explicitly disabled in ColdFusion Administrator)
  3. Verify CFOBJECT tag is enabled
    Check the ColdFusion Administrator settings for CFOBJECT tag permissions, or attempt to use the CFOBJECT tag in a test CFML page. Review security settings in the ColdFusion Administrator console under Java/COM settings.
    Affected if CFOBJECT tag is enabled and permitted for use (not disabled in security settings)
  4. Confirm user access to CFML script creation
    Determine if standard users have write access to directories where CFML scripts can be placed (such as web root, custom tag paths, or any directory mapped as a ColdFusion template path). Check file system permissions on the web root or cfmx directories.
    Affected if Local users can write .cfm files to directories that ColdFusion processes as templates

A user is affected if ColdFusion MX 6.0 or 6.1 is installed AND either CreateObject function or CFOBJECT tag is enabled, AND local users can create or modify CFML files in web-accessible directories.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable the CreateObject function and CFOBJECT tag if not required, or migrate to a supported ColdFusion version as these extremely outdated versions (2004 era) are no longer supported and contain known security flaws.

Fix this in Coldfusion Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2004-2204 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2004-2204 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data