CVE-2005-0059
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Message Queuing component of Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows XP SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) component allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted MSMQ messages. Affected systems include Windows 2000 and Windows XP SP1.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Message Queuing (MSMQ) is installedOpen Services (services.msc) and look for 'Message Queuing' in the list of services, or run 'sc query' to enumerate installed servicesAffected if Message Queuing is present in the list of installed services
-
Check if the MSMQ service is runningRun 'sc query MSMQ' or view the Status column in Services for the Message Queuing serviceAffected if The service shows a status of Running
-
Determine the Windows versionRun 'winver' or check System Properties to identify the exact Windows version and service packAffected if The system is Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows 98se, or Windows XP (any version)
-
Check for security updates related to MSMQOpen Add or Remove Programs and view the list of installed updates, or use 'wmic qfe list' to enumerate installed hotfixesAffected if No security updates addressing CVE-2005-0059 are installed (compare against known patches for this vulnerability)
A system is affected if it runs an unpatched Windows 2000, 98, 98se, or XP with Message Queuing installed and the MSMQ service is running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability; for systems that cannot be patched, disable the Message Queuing service or implement network-level filtering to block external MSMQ traffic.
Windows XP SP2 or later; Windows 2000 SP4 with MS05-017 applied; or migrate to Windows 7/10/11 for all legacy systems
- Identify all systems running Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows 98se, or Windows XP that have the Message Queuing (MSMQ) component enabled
- For Windows XP systems: Upgrade to Windows XP Service Pack 2 or later, which includes the MS05-017 security update that patches this vulnerability
- For Windows 2000 systems: Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS05-017 (if available for your specific SP level) or upgrade to a supported Windows version
- For Windows 98/98se systems: These operating systems are end-of-life and received no patch for this vulnerability; migrate to a supported Windows version
- After patching/upgrade, verify the Message Queuing service is properly secured or disabled if not needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,368.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-0059 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-0059 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data