CVE-2009-1123
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe kernel in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 and SP3, Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Server 2008 SP2 does not properly validate changes to unspecified kernel objects, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Windows Kernel Desktop Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Windows kernel where improper validation of changes to unspecified kernel objects allows a local attacker to gain elevated privileges through a crafted application. The flaw affects multiple Windows versions from 2000 through Server 2008.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' or check System Properties to determine the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if Running Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, or Windows Server 2008 (all versions)
-
Confirm patch MS09-025 installationOpen Control Panel > Programs and Features > View installed updates, or run 'wmic qfe list' command to list installed hotfixes, and search for KB961371 (the patch for this vulnerability)Affected if The security update KB961371 is NOT installed
-
Check user account contextRun 'whoami /all' or 'whoami /groups' to see current user privileges and group membershipsAffected if Running as a standard user or unprivileged account on an unpatched affected system (privilege escalation only matters for low-privilege attackers)
-
Verify local user permissionsRun 'net user' or check Local Users and Groups (lusrmgr.msc) to enumerate local user accountsAffected if Untrusted or low-privilege local accounts exist on an unpatched system, which could exploit this flaw
You are affected if you are running any unpatched version of Windows 2000, XP, Vista, Server 2003, or Server 2008 and have untrusted local users on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security patch MS09-025 which addresses this kernel vulnerability. For legacy systems no longer supported by Microsoft, implement compensating controls such as restricting local user permissions, application whitelisting, or network isolation.
Apply MS09-025 security update; for end-of-life systems (Windows 2000, Windows XP post-support), upgrade to Windows 7 or later with current security updates
- Apply Microsoft Security Bulletin MS09-025, which addresses this kernel vulnerability and multiple related issues
- For Windows XP systems: Ensure SP3 is applied, then install MS09-025 security update from Microsoft Update or Windows Update
- For Windows Server 2003 SP2: Install MS09-025 security update from Microsoft Update or Windows Update
- For Windows Vista systems: Install MS09-025 security update from Microsoft Update or Windows Update
- For Windows Server 2008 SP2: Install MS09-025 security update from Microsoft Update or Windows Update
- After applying the update, restart the affected systems to complete the remediation
- Note: Windows 2000 SP4 reached end of life and did not receive an official patch for this vulnerability; upgrade to a supported operating system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-1123 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-1123 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data