Windows 2000Operating system · Microsoft

CVE-2005-1980

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2005-10-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Distributed Transaction Controller in Microsoft Windows allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (MSDTC service hang) via a crafted Transaction Internet Protocol (TIP) message that causes DTC to repeatedly connect to a target IP and port number after an error occurs, aka the "Distributed TIP Vulnerability."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Controller (MSDTC) has a vulnerability where a remote attacker can send a crafted Transaction Internet Protocol (TIP) message causing the MSDTC service to hang. The specific flaw causes DTC to enter a loop repeatedly attempting to connect to a target IP and port after an error occurs, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply the relevant Microsoft security patch (MS05-018) or disable MSDTC if not required. Block TIP ports (ports 3372-3373) at the firewall to prevent external attackers from sending malicious TIP messages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Windows 2000Operating system
Affected:all versions
Windows 2003 ServerOperating system
Affected:= 64-bit= itanium= r2= sp1
Windows XpOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Windows version and Service Pack
    Run 'winver' or check System Properties to determine Windows version. For Windows 2003 Server, also verify if it is 64-bit, Itanium, R2, or SP1.
    Affected if Version is Windows 2000 (any), Windows XP (any), or Windows 2003 Server 64-bit/Itanium/R2/SP1 - these are in the affected product list
  2. Verify MSDTC service is running
    Open Services console (services.msc) and locate 'Distributed Transaction Coordinator', or run command 'sc query msdtc' to check service status.
    Affected if MSDTC service is running - the vulnerability only affects systems where this service is active
  3. Confirm MSDTC is enabled
    Open Component Services (dcomcnfg), navigate to My Computer > Distributed Transaction Coordinator, or check registry key HKLM\Software\Microsoft\MSDTC for configuration.
    Affected if MSDTC is enabled and configured on the system, not disabled
  4. Check network exposure of TIP ports
    Run 'netstat -an | findstr "3372 3373"' to see if Transaction Internet Protocol ports 3372-3373 are listening, or review firewall inbound rules for these ports.
    Affected if TIP ports 3372-3373 are open and accessible from network (the attack vector requires these ports to be reachable)
  5. Verify MS05-018 patch is installed
    Check Add/Remove Programs for security update KB894169, or run 'wmic qfe list' and search for MS05-018 in the output.
    Affected if Security patch MS05-018 (KB894169) has NOT been installed - unpatched systems remain vulnerable

System is affected if running a vulnerable Windows version with MSDTC enabled/running and TIP ports accessible, and the MS05-018 security patch has not been applied.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Microsoft security patch (MS05-018) or disable MSDTC if not required. Block TIP ports (ports 3372-3373) at the firewall to prevent external attackers from sending malicious TIP messages.

Fix this in Windows 2000 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,190
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2005-1980 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2005-1980 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data