Database ServerDatabase / datastore · Oracle

CVE-2006-0547

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-02-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Oracle Database 8i, 9i, and 10g allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL statements in the context of the SYS user and bypass audit logging, including statements to create new privileged database accounts, via a modified AUTH_ALTER_SESSION attribute in the authentication phase of the Transparent Network Substrate (TNS) protocol. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that this issue has been addressed by Oracle. It is possible that this is the same issue as Oracle Vuln# DB18 from the January 2006 CPU, in which case this would be subsumed by CVE-2006-0265.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Oracle Database 8i, 9g, and 10g vulnerability allowing remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL statements in SYS context by modifying the AUTH_ALTER_SESSION attribute during TNS protocol authentication. The flaw also enables bypassing audit logging, permitting creation of privileged database accounts.

MitigationApply the Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) addressing DB18 from January 2006 (CVE-2006-0265 may subsume this), and restrict network access to the TNS listener to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Database ServerDatabase / datastore
Affected:= 8.1.7.4= 9.2.0.6= 9.2.0.7= 10.1.0.3= 10.1.0.4= 10.1.0.5= 10.2.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Oracle Database version
    Connect to the database using SQL*Plus or SQL Developer and run: SELECT VERSION FROM V$INSTANCE;
    Affected if The version matches any of: 8.1.7.4, 9.2.0.6, 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.3, 10.1.0.4, 10.1.0.5, or 10.2.0.1
  2. Verify TNS listener network exposure
    Examine the listener.ora file (typically in $ORACLE_HOME/network/admin/) and check if the LISTENER is configured with a non-restricted ADDRESS or uses TCP protocol on an exposed IP. Use command: lsnrctl status LISTENER
    Affected if The TNS listener accepts connections from untrusted networks or IP addresses outside the trusted environment
  3. Confirm audit logging is enabled
    Run the query: SELECT VALUE FROM V$PARAMETER WHERE NAME = 'audit_trail';
    Affected if Audit trail is set to NONE, DB, or OS, but the vulnerability allows bypassing this logging mechanism entirely when exploited
  4. Check for privileged account creation events
    Review audit records or alert log for unexpected creation of accounts with DBA, SYSDBA, or privileged roles that were not initiated by authorized administrators
    Affected if Privileged accounts appear in the database without legitimate creation records in the audit trail

You are affected if you run any of the specific versions (8.1.7.4, 9.2.0.6, 9.2.0.7, 10.1.0.3-10.1.0.5, or 10.2.0.1) and your TNS listener is accessible to remote authenticated users on untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) addressing DB18 from January 2006 (CVE-2006-0265 may subsume this), and restrict network access to the TNS listener to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Database Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-0547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-0547 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data