X1185Hardware / appliance · Lexmark

CVE-2006-0577

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2006-02-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Lexmark X1185 printer allows local users to gain SYSTEM privileges by navigating to the "Appearance" dialog and selecting the "Additional styles (skins) are available on the Lexmark web site" option, which launches a web browser that is running with SYSTEM privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Lexmark X1185 printer software launches a web browser with SYSTEM (highest) privileges when users navigate to the Appearance dialog and select the option to browse to Lexmark's website for additional styles/skins. This allows any local user to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM-level permissions, achieving full privilege escalation on the affected Windows system.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Lexmark for this vulnerability. If no patch is available (product may be End-of-Life), implement least-privilege user accounts and restrict local users from installing or running printer software, or consider upgrading to a supported printer model.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
X1185Hardware / appliance
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Lexmark X1185 software installation
    Check for installed Lexmark printer software on the Windows system. Open Control Panel > Programs and Features (or Add/Remove Programs) and look for Lexmark X1185 or Lexmark printer-related entries.
    Affected if Lexmark X1185 software appears in the installed programs list
  2. Locate the vulnerable executable component
    Search for Lexmark-related executables in Program Files directories, particularly looking for components related to the printer driver or printer utility software. Check paths like C:\Program Files\Lexmark or C:\Program Files (x86)\Lexmark.
    Affected if Lexmark X1185 executables or driver files are present on the system
  3. Check for the Appearance dialog feature
    Launch the Lexmark printer software or driver configuration utility and navigate to find an Appearance or Settings dialog that offers options to browse to Lexmark's website for additional styles or skins.
    Affected if The Appearance dialog with web browsing option is accessible to standard users
  4. Verify process privilege level
    When the web browsing feature is triggered from the Lexmark software, observe the spawned browser process in Task Manager. Check the user account column to determine if the browser runs under SYSTEM or a high-privilege account rather than the current user account.
    Affected if The browser or related spawned process runs under SYSTEM or an elevated account rather than the logged-in user account

If Lexmark X1185 software is installed and its web browsing feature spawns processes with SYSTEM-level privileges, the environment is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Lexmark for this vulnerability. If no patch is available (product may be End-of-Life), implement least-privilege user accounts and restrict local users from installing or running printer software, or consider upgrading to a supported printer model.

Fix this in X1185 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2006-0577 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2006-0577 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data